In the First and Second Great Wars (1914-1918 and 1939-1945), with their European civil war reflection, Europe destroyed itself and its civilization with a furious fury. Where did the latest war end? In the total and multifaceted destruction of Europe. The supposed “winner” of the war, Great Britain, became a weak province of the “Western World”, it lost its empire! The true victors of the war were the USA and the Soviet Union, that is, two extra-European powers, extra-European not only geographically, but also in essence, as they never fully and creatively internalized the Hellenic European Culture, but on the contrary distorted it utilitarianly, partially but diligently applying its external forms.
At the same time, their European populations were possessed by a frenzied apathy towards European Culture. A tragic example of this is the choice of the majority of Greeks, who took up arms to overthrow the regime and the culture of freedom, in order to “ascend” to the Soviet paradise of the proletarians and to relocate to …. “Gulag Archipelago”, which of course is also a common desire of the French, Italians, Scandinavians and others!
At the same time, something truly unprecedented in the history of human societies appeared: The European peoples were mentally seized by a very serious complex of depressive guilt, inescapable inferiority, generalized unworthiness, incessant self-blame and debilitating self-rejection, clearly of a delusional nature, as these negative emotions now reached a consolidated and unshakable dimension with physical reality, constituting purely delusional ideas. This syndrome in the present historical phase reaches its peak, and constitutes the most malignant form of dislocation of the familiar conscience (of culture, history, morals and customs).
The “European” chronically suffers, experiences paroxysmal “national self-contempt”, accuses himself of non-existent and imaginary heinous offenses of all kinds, believes that he is inhuman, guilty, vile and sinful, that he deserves to be punished and therefore will soon be led to horrible and unbearable conditions of impoverishment, even to death, considering himself responsible for… future disasters, which he predicts will occur in Europe and all of humanity.
When, in fact, the horrible and agonizing feelings of guilt contain nuggets of historical correspondence, then his inherent delusional idea completely overturns the obvious and obvious historical truth. Therefore, as the main component of the said psychosyndrome, “ethnomasochism” must be considered inexorably, that is, the guilt or even the devaluation by a population of its own ethnicity.
The dominant delusional idea is that the “Third World” suffered enormous exploitation. …… The European blames himself for the Crusades, because they interrupted the (murderous and sometimes brutal) course of Islam towards the conquest of the whole world (since previously Leo III and Charles Martel had repelled the massive Islamic invasions in the East and the West respectively)! The European commits suicide, declaring that he alone is to blame for the many and varied sufferings of “Humanity”, as Europeans have always been the oppressors, so now he must, as atonement, accept his own…. killing without complaint, in order to pay his historical debt, accepting the colonization and conquest of the Old Continent. Moreover, Europe is to blame for illegal immigration…..again, because it is the one that wages wars! (The USA is not imperialist and warmongering but a protective power of the weak)
What is often referred to as “exploitation” of the Islamic world by the West is often the opposite. For example, in the countries of the Persian Gulf, oil was discovered, which is not at all the product of persistent labor or a prototype of creative thought of the inhabitants of the region, it is a historical-geographical “lottery”, and European technical companies do all the work, ultimately having a percentage of profit from the titanic work. On the contrary, the known and unknown kings, princes, sultans, emirs and sheikhs receive the lion’s share, (truly unimaginable amounts), so that they can live in outrageous luxury and opulence, [characteristic of the Mohammedan rulers since the time of Caliph Muawiyah (655)]!
“Islamophobia” is defined as: prejudice against, or negative feelings such as fear, dread, aversion, towards the religion of Islam and Muslims. Psychologists define Islamophobia as a specific “social anxiety”, in which a person does not feel uncomfortable at the sight of Muslims or various Islamic institutions or symbols, but is seized with fear and has the tendency to flee. The notorious and active “European Commission against Racism and Intolerance” (ECRI) defines Islamophobia as “the fear or prejudice about Islam, Muslims and issues related to them”.
But what are the … inappropriate and horrible things that a … intolerant person believes (according to the current “institutional” conventions of social behavior) to be condemned as Islamophobic, as Islamophobia is a particularly aggravating form of racism?
Does such a … passionate and uneducated fool believe that Islam:
- It is an absolutely monolithic worldview, which is static and not susceptible to change.
- It is a clearly separated cultural formation, it is something “other”, it has no common values with other “cultures” and is not influenced by them.
- It is as a way of life and social organization inferior to the West, it is irrational, primitive and sexist to the point of becoming barbaric.
- It is violent, aggressive, threatening, supportive of terrorism and cultivates the clash of civilizations.
- It is also a political ideology, which is used for political and military purposes.
But is Islam compatible with a modern “civilized society” (such as those of the member countries of the European Union)?
Is it possible to believe as much as you need to believe in order to be a good Muslim, to have military and economic power, and at the same time not be an unconscious threat to the civilized societies of non-Muslims?
The answer to this (rhetorical) question is “obviously not.” If a lasting peace between the West and Islam is ever to be achieved, Islam must undergo a vast and radical transformation. This transformation, to be acceptable to Muslims, must also appear to come exclusively from Muslims themselves. Therefore, it is no exaggeration to say that the ultimate fate of civilization lies primarily in the hands of supposedly “moderate” Muslims.
If Muslims cannot transform their religion into a worldview, a fundamentally peaceful ideology (or else…to completely ignore it), it is indeed very difficult for anyone to examine rationally how Islam and the West will manage to avoid a permanent state of war between them, especially on countless fronts (one of which will be the wider area of the European Union!)
In this case, nuclear, biological and chemical weapons are a reality that cannot be dismissed as insignificant or unimportant!
To understand the issue in depth, often the details reveal the essence, so here is a key piece of news that was … despised:
In 2003, a very high-level Saudi jurist, Sheikh Salih al-Fawzan (a prominent Muslim scholar and member of several high-ranking religious bodies in Saudi Arabia), considered the highest legal scholar of Islam in this country, declared: “Slavery is part of Islam. Slavery is part of jihad, and jihad will continue to exist as long as Islam exists!”
