From humanism today we experience Transhumanism. The reason is the survival of the elite who rule the world with an iron fist. You see this elite is a slim minority. There is only one thing that scares her: do not increase the population to such a point that it becomes impossible to control it. A sufficient number of e.g. Italians with a strong national identity and conscience, would certainly bring the “globalism” that is struggling to establish itself upside down. So does a corresponding population of Chinese or Japanese or Russians or Germans or Greeks etc.
The goal is the compression of human potential, from personality to individuality. Over time it has been proven that this way, it is easier to manage populations. The personality is annoying. It thinks, it affects, it inspires. But individuality is harmless no matter what it thinks. It is disconnected from the whole and thus does not disturb.
The vehicle chosen for the journey to impersonal humanity is liberalism.
Liberalism therefore has at the center of its philosophy and action, the liberation of the individualism of man. And there, exactly at the first step, he makes the fatal mistake. Because it is deeply wrong to want to “liberate” the individualism of man, cutting him off from the rest with which he goes along “by factory design” on the path of life. “Man is a social and political being by nature” as Aristotle has taught us, who goes a step further and recognizes as a free man only those who understand their obligations to the community.
The collective awareness of man is a fundamental issue for his well-being and progress. The collective identity, therefore, and the human quality, are the main components of the “ecosystem” in which the mental and spiritual health of people survives.
Having its first flowers in Protestantism, liberalism begins to question collectiveness in man, to consider it a commitment and regression and to praise individualism. Thus Protestantism breaks its relationship with the Catholic Church (on the occasion of the Papacy) denying the collective identity of Catholicism. He has not yet denied the collective identity of Christianity, for he would lose the vehicle on which he travels.
In the historical continuity, liberalism succeeds and spreads. It now challenges the Western political establishment, specifically Western imperialism, denying this collective identity as well. Then he rebels against the collective identity of the National State, seeking and establishing a state of citizens (citoyen).
Then throughout the 20th century (politically and militarily) an epic conflict takes place between Nationalism, communism and liberalism, in which conflict liberalism ultimately prevails but communism also survives. In the second period of the 20th century, liberalism manages to express the middle bourgeois classes as well, promoting economic prosperity through the liberation of individual activity. It thus maintains the strange attitude of expressing the wider political center while at the same time considering itself progressive and rooted in the “progressive” political spaces. Somehow, he manages to dismantle communism as well.
In the 21st century, (since the Soviet Union has also collapsed) liberalism finds itself without another substantial rival. It is what Francis Fukuyama attributed by declaring: “there are no more ideologies” in his book “The End of History”. Fukuyama concludes: “liberal democracies and capitalism constitute the ultimate form of human government and thus the end of history.”
So in this phase, liberalism feeling justified and strong, realizing its true purpose, gets rid of the middle bourgeois classes and gets rid of them violently, trying to exterminate them. As he tries to wipe out the Nations (having defeated the Nation States, it seems like the logical next step) with his tales of racism and practices of illegal immigration.
It has now morphed into neo-liberalism and is actively distancing itself from any “centrist” political character. The officers of neo-liberalism, see Klaus Swab, George Soros Bill Gates etc, attack against any collective identity and in every way.
And so we arrive at our days, where there are now only two collective identities left to break.
The first is sexual identity. Which of course is collective, since one experiences masculinity or femininity by acting interactively with others, within a collective biological identity.
It therefore creates a new, “sexual individualism”. Gender can be something fluid and not static. This is where the woke absurdities, the extremes, the arbitrariness of the various minorities are based.
Bourgeois democracy in its traditional form is based on the will of the many. But it is easier to direct some minorities and thus the democracies (the so-called western states) in the 21st century, now impose the wishes of the minorities and not the majority, most of which they themselves have constructed with political cynicism and nurture them with social poison.
The second and last collective identity that remains to be broken in order for neo-liberalism to dominate finally and holistically and officially is the human identity!
Breaking the human identity, will “someone” be able to choose not to be human (?!). Do you realize the cataclysmic cultural annihilation this final stage will bring? In the influence of conditions, rights, obligations, laws, etc.? In interpersonal relationships? On the social web? And finally to the very mental health of people…
Artificial intelligence is a key step for this stage. Also the various “improvements” that are designed and applied (still experimentally) to humans but also of course the non-bio-ethical genetics, with its interventions in the normal reproductive process.
Today as you read these lines, you may consider them science fiction, but I challenge you to think: how many of the predictions of science fiction of the 20th century have been applied to our everyday lives? Almost all!!!
The issue of the fragmentation of collective identity is extremely serious. The question of the alteration or even disappearance of the collective human identity is capital.
But I warn you that it is already in place!!! There are many forums that “explore” “transhumanism” or “post humanism” and “transhumanism”. And these forums have legendary chapters, famous personalities, scientific and political connections. Propaganda is in full swing to lay the carpet for the coming inhuman needs of neo-liberalism.
But human history teaches that NO ONE has ever accomplished anything as an individual. ALL the achievements (but also the problems) of humanity are the result of collective action. Whether we refer to art, or culture, or science, or religion, or war.
Therefore an “atomistic humanity” simply will not survive. Somehow the great depopulation aimed at by the ruling elite, to feel safe lying on top of a limited, disconnected and easy-to-manage post-humanity, will be enforced.
