The physics of information, the narratives of Posthumanism and how a hopeful future is shaped

Can the future, which is considered not yet created, ever affect the course of our lives? Can something considered immaterial, such as information, ever affect matter? In this analysis we will explain why Consciousness is not a product of the brain, but an independent vibrational structure that functions as a navigation system through our known space-time.

The fact that we do not realize that everything is consciousness and not matter causes extremely negative consequences, such as that for 300 years science, from the moment it became capable of producing technology, in order to oppose religion, set its doctrines and after all, today it is on the point of repeating the same follies that religion first committed. Its destructive doctrines were materialism, causality, determinism and randomness.

However, today there are major scientific discoveries in the physics of the microcosm, which were made only during the last decades and have radically changed our worldview.

These are exactly what the French physics professor Philippe Guillemant is investigating, complaining that they are carefully hidden from the general public, with the aim of convincing people that they are machines. If it is spread that this is just another sick narrative, we will be headed for the collapse of control of humanity by algorithms enforced by a handful of highly perverted subjects who think they are gods, and consequently, a much brighter future.

The charm of synchronicity

Philippe Guilleman is an unconventional physics engineering professor and author, and he practices his science at the Polytechnique de Marseille laboratory belonging to France’s National Research Foundation (CNRS).

An expert in Chaos Theory and artificial intelligence, his work led him to create two innovative companies licensed by the French National Research Foundation, Synapsys and Uratec, for which he received many awards, including the Crystal Medal of the National Research Foundation of France.

Until 2010, his awards, experiments, and publications were on information processing methods derived from Chaos Theory that he applied to pattern recognition, eye movement analysis, brain activity categorization, and the formulation of neural network.

Guilleman was also interested in the phenomenon of Synchronicity from a very young age, where he was fascinated by the possible connection between this phenomenon which he personally experienced in 1976, and certain paradoxes of modern physics, in particular, the EPR paradoxes.

But the eminent Nobel laureate physicist Wolfgang Pauli (1900-1958) was also fascinated by Synchronicity much earlier, as evidenced by his correspondence with the famous psychoanalyst Carl Jung, “father” of Synchronicity.

In 1981, Guilleman, still a student, and while he was thinking of dealing systematically with the phenomenon of Synchronicity, the group of the French physicist and optician Alain Aspect (Alain Aspect) carried out a very important experiment, which was to play a dominant role in the interpretation of quantum mechanics.

Until 2010, his awards, experiments, and publications were on information processing methods derived from Chaos Theory that he applied to pattern recognition, eye movement analysis, brain activity categorization, and the formulation of neural networks.

Guilleman was also interested in the phenomenon of Synchronicity from a very young age, where he was fascinated by the possible connection between this phenomenon which he personally experienced in 1976, and certain paradoxes of modern physics, in particular, the EPR paradoxes.

But the eminent Nobel laureate physicist Wolfgang Pauli (1900-1958) was also fascinated by Synchronicity much earlier, as evidenced by his correspondence with the famous psychoanalyst Carl Jung, “father” of Synchronicity.

Today, Guilleman is conducting fundamental research in the physics of information, which aims to revise our understanding of spacetime, taking into account the further dimensions of space that we learn nothing about.

Research involves taking into account the inevitable presence of bifurcations at any scale, which impose non-causal choices, that is, involving the introduction of future information or information beyond our four-dimensional space-time.

These issues would soon force physicists to take seriously the influence of the future on the course of events, a process that Guilleman analyzes in his infamous theory of Double Causation.

In 1981, Guilleman, still a student, and while he was thinking of dealing systematically with the phenomenon of Synchronicity, the group of the French physicist and optician Alain Aspect (Alain Aspect) carried out a very important experiment, which was to play a dominant role in the interpretation of quantum mechanics.

The Theory of Double Causation

The conception of the Theory of Dual Causation (or flexible space-time), a model of reality creation based on free will, through retroactive causation, is Professor Guilleman’s magnus opus.

Although it is a metaphysical theory, however, it is based on a scientific assumption – macroscopic determinism – which results in a lack of information, which can be covered by consciousness.

This – for many strange – theory was presented for the first time in Guilleman’s first book entitled La route du temps (The Road of Time), 2010, which he gradually developed in his next four books: La physique de la conscience of consciousness), 2015, Le pic de l’esprit (The peak of the spirit), 2017, Le grand virage de l’ humanité (The great turn of humanity), 2021, and the last, La physique du futur lumineux of the Bright Future), 2023, in which he presents his research into the physics of consciousness and how it could shake up our beliefs about our world and universe.

In fact, the Theory of Dual Causality is composed of various interpretations of the results of modern physics on various fields, such as Chaos Theory, Relativity Theory, quantum mechanics, statistical physics and more recently, information physics.

Indeed, over the past seven decades, several scientists have sought to find other explanations for randomness and synchronicity phenomena, proposing various alternative theories. All focus on understanding the underlying order of reality that appears to govern these manifestations.

The theory of Double Causation is concerned with the mechanisms of a second causality that would be retroactive, as examined by the late physicist and cosmologist Stephen Hawking, and summarized as follows:

Through our observation we create [past] reality. This backward causality would be able to explain many strange phenomena such as synchronicity, extraordinary coincidences and some life-saving intuitions. However, Dual Causation is a metaphysical theory since it is subject to the following two assumptions:

1. The authenticity of our free will

Our freedom is not an illusion, we really make choices in our lives, which do not depend only on the past.

2. The ubiquity of the future

The universe has already – in part – evolved into our future, according to multiple versions that allow our destiny to change.

These two cases lead to the emergence of the very important role of free will in the realization of an individual destiny. The power of intention, upon which hundreds of books have been written, lies in a man’s ability to instantly determine the probabilities of the occurrence of a chosen destiny, at the expense of another, thus rendered less probable.

Guilleman tells us that all possible futures of an individual or a community evolve simultaneously, according to their probabilities within a personal or collective “Tree of Life.”

Second causation, as opposed to ordinary or even recursive causation, explains how certain causes can sometimes be derived from their effects, while the effects are supposed to be derived from the causes.

It is about the influence of the future on the present that is possible only in an already evolved universe (however, not “frozen”, the professor points out), where an inverted determinism works, analogous to the theory of cosmology “from top to bottom” (top -down) by Stephen Hawking. (Top-down theory assumes that the present chooses the past from a superposition of many possible histories).

From this it follows that the probabilities of certain effects, if increased by intention, can go back in time to increase in our immediate future the chances of opportunities appearing to be the causes.

This translates into coincidences or the manifestation of a synchronized randomness full of meaning, and – most surprisingly – strongly suggests the influence of a particular state of mind.

The most interesting point about the Theory of Double Causation is that it is presented as experimentally verifiable, both scientifically and personally: Professor Guilleman, on the occasion of deliberately producing synchronicities, experienced a flurry of coincidences, some of which he considered to be direct proof of the second backward causality.

In his book The Road of Time, he explains how we can mentally induce coincidences and use them properly, and informs us how this theory explains many mysterious phenomena observed over the centuries that challenge human reason.

Consciousness as a vibrational structure

According to Guilleman, the new understanding of the nature and role of consciousness could lead to a major shift in consciousness and revolutionize science, challenging the deterministic dogmas and materialistic beliefs that have led humanity to its current tragic impasse.

According to him, human consciousness should no longer be seen as a product of the brain, but as a vibratory structure that functions as a real, intuitive navigation system.

The professor argues that it is our consciousness that determines our perception of reality, and not our brain that is used only to recognize and analyze information, and also that several unusual phenomena studied scientifically tend to confirm the intuitive, vibrational and extra-cerebral nature of human consciousness.

The extra-cerebral nature of human consciousness is confirmed by near-death experiences (NDE), out-of-body experiences, synchronicities, and extra-sensory perception (ESP) which can manifest as telepathy, vision distance or as a premonition.

Guilleman also discusses how the workings of consciousness challenge our ordinary understanding of time, particularly how the future affects the present:

“The future has already been created, yet it can be permanently changed under the vibrational influence of consciousness, like the course of a GPS. In this way, a myriad of possible futures can be created for each person.”

According to the extraordinary physicist “Consciousness remains a navigational system that necessarily leads us to experience, immediately or in the long run, the result of our thoughts, carried by the vibration of our emotions.”

Correspondingly, it is also important to realign our emotional intelligence – of the heart – in a society that favors intellect, that is, analytical intelligence.

Although Guilleman believes that emotional intelligence must regain its rightful place, he nevertheless insists on the importance of cultivating a middle ground, which harmoniously reconciles emotional and analytical intelligence.

The four types of information

According to Guilleman, what we call reality from the recent discoveries of quantum physics has been explicitly denounced as an illusion. These discoveries are the four kinds of information which, while not constituting matter, play an important role in the conduct of events:

  1. The gap information,
  2. Information outside of four-dimensional spacetime (or quantum randomness)
  3. The information that already exists in the future,
  4. The information that is “lost” in interactions.

This is why today’s equation physics fails to become Tomorrow’s physics: because it cannot properly handle the information problem. Therefore, due to the weakness of the equations, the following doctrines were necessarily born:

  • Materialism, which arises due to ignorance of the information that exists in the vacuum,
  • The randomness (fundamental or quantum), which arises due to the ignorance of information that exists outside of four-dimensional space-time,
  • Temporal determinism, which arises due to ignorance of information that already exists in the future,
  • Strict causality (irreversibility), which arises due to the ignorance of information that is lost in interactions.
  • The correct solution to these problems involves overturning our conception of time and introducing into physics a model of consciousness that is capable of describing free will (whether real or illusory) in the form of a subordination of four-dimensional spacetime to systems information outside of it.

The Territory of Thought

So since we know that the future exists “out there somewhere,” it is urgent to know the outside that surrounds an area that Guilleman calls “The Park of Thought.”

Why should we go there? Because the inside of the Park, being fenced off by the “wire fences” of materialism, randomness, determinism and strict causality, which surround the “swamp of consciousness” has now become absurd…

Guilleman describes the “Park of Thought” that is formed due to ignorance of the four kinds of information (or the role of consciousness), and in seeking to raise awareness, he calls into question the four destructive beliefs that gave rise to the four doctrines:

  1. Consciousness is a by-product of the brain (materialism)
  2. Nature plays dice to make its choices (Darwinism)
  3. Reality over time evolves mechanically (mechanism)
  4. Causality cannot be reversed (“frozen” past).

These beliefs have created many others, the most dangerous of which today is the one that leads us directly to transhumanism, and more generally to the denial of human nature by the degradation of all our moral values: the fact that we believe that we have believed that we are machines , leads us straight to a future of total alienation.

Challenging even one of these beliefs, which somehow delineate the “Thought Park” controlled by the four old-world psychic implants, can lead one into vertigo-inducing situations and is not without pitfalls.

These states are made up of other beliefs, of different origins: for example, the river of religions, the swamp of consciousness, the hill of “mysteries” (i.e. the occult), the valley of uncertainty, the dump of New Age business, the abyss of illusions, etc. Check out the very informative image below:

The professor states that his main goal is to point out the new regions of human reason that lie outside the dreaded Park of Thought that has become uninhabitable, so that he can help people move into them in complete safety.

Guilleman informs us that in addition to the four pillars of pseudoscience analyzed above, they also support it:

  • A God called Fortune,
  • Two demons called Maxwell’s Demon and Laplace’s Demon, who act just like Satan and Lucifer,
  • Ten Commandments.

The Ten Commandments of Pseudoscience

The Ten Commandments of pseudoscience are as follows and lead respectively to a total of Ten pernicious doctrines:

  1. Nature is meaningless and without the slightest purpose [determinism]
  2. The universe was born from an initial explosion (big bang) [neo-creation]
  3. Everything that happens is a result of causality (thus the past) [fate worship]
  4. Consciousness is a product of the brain [materialism]
  5. Reality is independent of our states of consciousness [objectivism]
  6. The past cannot be changed [passivity]
  7. The evolution of life is due to the natural selection of the fittest [Darwinism],
  8. We are machines that only technology can improve [transhumanism]
  9. Our memory, premonitions, visions, and even our identity come from our brain [reductionism]
  10. All unexplained phenomena are illusions or coincidences [science].

Why aren’t we machines?

However, if we succeed in escaping from the prison of the mind as it is now constituted, we shall perceive the existence of the four kinds of immaterial information which have been proved by modern experiments of logic, which compel us to consider the certainty that consciousness is not a product of brain and that we have a soul.

So we are not machines, because machines are determined by the past, they are the result of programs, where with an algorithm based on the past, we can predict everything a machine will do in the future, even interacting with its surroundings.

At this point, Professor Guilleman reveals to us the awesome discovery he made while studying mechanical optics on robotic androids: Any information coming from the future cannot penetrate a machine.

As expected, with such an optimistic worldview based on the discoveries of physical information, Professor Guilleman, came under fire from globalists, promoters of Wokism and their followers, receiving organized attacks with accusations of “charlatanism”, “opportunism” ” and “pseudoscience”.

But since they promote pseudoscience, they have not been able to deconstruct the arguments and its ever-increasing popularity.

I remind you that the insightful Guilleman, immediately realized the fraud of acquiring immunity and the dangerousness of vaccinations against Covid-19 during the pseudo-pandemic and denounced forced vaccinations as the threshold of transhumanism, declaring on his social media pages:

“They want to lead us to transhumanism. Their motives are to capture a very large market and organize a society run by artificial intelligences, according to transhumanist ideology, based on ignorance.”

About the author

The Liberal Globe is an independent online magazine that provides carefully selected varieties of stories. Our authoritative insight opinions, analyses, researches are reflected in the sections which are both thematic and geographical. We do not attach ourselves to any political party. Our political agenda is liberal in the classical sense. We continue to advocate bold policies in favour of individual freedoms, even if that means we must oppose the will and the majority view, even if these positions that we express may be unpleasant and unbearable for the majority.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *