Russia is ‘targeting’ Britain as responsible for the Crimean bridge attack

Extremely ominous for international security seem to be the developments and consequences of the terrorist attack on the Crimean bridge or Kers bridge: Russia’s security services are leaking information that the attack was organized by the British services and carried out by a special group of saboteurs of the SAS (Special Air Service) Britain’s special unorthodox warfare unit.

According to a report by the authoritative journalist and well-sourced in the Russian government, Sergei Ishenko in Svobodnaya Press citing sources in the Russian intelligence services: “SAS special forces have in the past participated quite effectively in the Korean War, the conflict in Northern Ireland, the war between Britain and Argentina over the Falkland Islands (Malvinas), the events in the Persian Gulf and the NATO Campaign in Afghanistan.

In June this year, the presence of British saboteurs in Ukraine was confirmed. (…)

On August 17, both here and in the West, there were suggestions that the SAS “warmed up” in our Kursk area in front of the Crimean bridgehead.

On this day, electricity transmission towers were blown up near the villages of Pryamitsyno and Lyubitskoye, which are located 44 kilometers from each other and lead to the Kursk nuclear power plant.

All this threatened major technological problems at the nuclear power plant. But the Russian personnel managed to prevent the worst”

Such articles are not at all common in Russia. And nothing is written in Russia at this level without approval and inside information.

Because they are now demonstrating that a state, Britain in this case, is using military forces to destroy Russian political infrastructure.

And they even refer to SAS sabotage that took place in order to destroy the Russian nuclear plant in Kursk.

About the author

The Liberal Globe is an independent online magazine that provides carefully selected varieties of stories. Our authoritative insight opinions, analyses, researches are reflected in the sections which are both thematic and geographical. We do not attach ourselves to any political party. Our political agenda is liberal in the classical sense. We continue to advocate bold policies in favour of individual freedoms, even if that means we must oppose the will and the majority view, even if these positions that we express may be unpleasant and unbearable for the majority.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *