Two member countries, Hungary and Slovakia, reject the EU peace plan

Hungary will block all forms of European aid to Ukraine. The Hungarian government officially informed the European Commission that Hungary will block all forms of European aid to Ukraine unless they “directly and unconditionally” support the Trump plan!

Viktor Orban warned that even the grandchildren of European citizens will pay for the new loan (135 billion euros) to Ukraine. He reiterated that the EU’s responsibility is the well-being of European citizens and not irrational and pointless geopolitical plans.

In the same vein, Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico pointed out that “in this agreement, Ukraine’s position is a hundred times worse than it was in April 2022,” referring to the preliminary agreement reached during the Istanbul talks early in the conflict, when Kiev unilaterally withdrew from those negotiations. “Who among these warmongers will admit this to the EU, when they were so fanatically supporting the war? Why did they send weapons non-stop? Why did they ban any ceasefire? Who will admit today’s mistakes?”

Fico referred to the EU leadership as “mediocre politicians who never learned what it means to play stupid games.” We see that Hungary and Slovakia, which from the beginning warned about the wrong direction of the European Commission, remain firm in their views, on the need for immediate peace in the Ukrainian issue.

And not only do they remain firm, but since the facts justify them, they are now starting to openly accuse the apprentice magicians of the European Commission. Because of course the Slovak Prime Minister is right that Ukraine’s position is clearly worse in this agreement than those that were discussed in Istanbul. And then Ukraine withdrew at the urging of the EU and leaders like the inexorable Boris Jonson. And the issue is not limited to a better or worse agreement since the blood that has flowed since then is too much.

The Trump side certainly agrees with the views of Hungary and Slovakia after keeping the European Commission in the “dark” regarding the peace plan. Apparently, it did so to avoid any obstacles that the leadership of the European Union, which has taken on the role of the cruel warmongering assistant of Ukraine, would try to put up.

The future is clear, the absolute discrediting of all those European politicians who incited the bloody war and are persecuting by all means the few member countries that had the courage to ask for peace. Thus we have arrived at the strange comic situation for the West, those who ask for an end to the war being “evil dictators” and those who ask for the continuation of the bloodshed being “progressive democrats”.

With peace in Ukraine, the war will end, as will the political career of all those who absurdly demand Ukraine’s accession to NATO and its scandalous accession to the EU. And they know this. And they do not hesitate to demand the continuation of the war in order to maintain their political careers.

At the same time, they invoke the “European Values” which they have completely violated. Instead of states that respect the law, they support the Zelensky government. Instead of states that respect their citizens, they support violent abductions from the streets and sending them to the front. Instead of prudence and promoting peace, they support the escalation of the war to nuclear. And they do all this by sucking out European wealth and telling all kinds of lies to the citizens.

Of course, the Ukrainian issue is no longer simple but extremely complex. The solution is not easy, but it is certainly not the continued humiliation of European states.

About the author

The Liberal Globe is an independent online magazine that provides carefully selected varieties of stories. Our authoritative insight opinions, analyses, researches are reflected in the sections which are both thematic and geographical. We do not attach ourselves to any political party. Our political agenda is liberal in the classical sense. We continue to advocate bold policies in favour of individual freedoms, even if that means we must oppose the will and the majority view, even if these positions that we express may be unpleasant and unbearable for the majority.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *