As soon as summer really begins, the piercing chant of “climate change” is already being heard by the meteorologists of the systemic television stations and the hysterical drama is starting to repeat itself, as it happens every year. Moreover, amateur climatologists among meteorologists, many journalists and reporters, are already pointing out, showing images of red-hot metal sheets and melted asphalt, that we should calculate when the end of the world is coming as a result of these somewhat extreme conditions. All the leading media tell us this every day to make it clear: The situation is getting worse and worse, the earth is warming dangerously.
It is fortunate that, in the meantime, in the real scientific community and not those scientists who are paid by obscure power centers like the WEF or by George Soros’s foundations, in contrast to previous years, a greater number of experts are indicating through their own editorial activity that one cannot speak of climate change towards global warming. The results of the measurements collected in recent decades offer no basis for such an assertion. And certainly not for the assumption that the demonized trace gas CO2 (carbon dioxide) in the air we breathe is responsible for it.
On this occasion, we refer here to two current interventions on the subject.
On the one hand, the Austrian online magazine www.tkp.at points out that the source of the CO2 trace gas is by no means primarily the “diabolical” industrial intervention of man in nature and that, consequently, mankind, according to the green worldview, should pay taxes for the emissions of this gas into the atmosphere. The author of the tkp.at article, Dr. Peter F. Meyer, explains in the example of the green worldview that “the traditional model of river emissions, according to which carbon is introduced into the atmosphere from the soil via rivers, creating CO2 in the atmosphere, is deeply flawed. Instead, rivers act as carbon transport systems that redistribute old carbon from the soil, rocks and geological layers into the atmosphere. It is not just a different order of magnitude, it is a completely different mechanism.”
A second voice is heard from Russia. In an article for RTDE, Vladimir Melnikov, chairman of the Scientific Council of Earth Cryology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, lays out the “Green Agenda” in his article entitled “Climate Change is Cyclical and Independent of Man.” He writes succinctly: “There is a diagram of temperature changes on Earth over the past 12,000 years that clearly proves that we are living in the interglacial period today, which, by the way, is coming to an end. I will tell you more: 6,000 years ago, the temperature on Earth was on average more than three degrees higher than it is now, and it was the heyday of the first Sumerian civilization. Yes, there is a slight increase in temperature today, but why is it called global warming when 700 years ago, at the time of Genghis Khan, it was warmer than it is today? In my opinion, it is more correct not to talk about global warming, but about restoring the normal temperature regime.”
Do the meteorologists of the systemic media know nothing about such expertise? We think that they simply do not care. These scientific works mean nothing to them, the climate hysteria and their own meteorological show bring them personal well-being (some even become deputies), they are not interested in anything other than personal profit, that is clear.
But why do they want to terrorize the world? Let the reader think about the answer, we know that those who read us do not belong to the category of sheep.
