As the Dreaded Moirai-Fates weave the burial shroud for the Globalizing “New World Order” and the “Monopolar West,” a worthy task that the few “old faithful,” today’s dissidents who still remain in the West, can accomplish is to keep a record, explaining why and how its once great civilization has come to this final and fatal turning point. They can also provide a great service to humanity, recording the incidents and accidents of the Fall of the West, providing a valuable object lesson for future generations—as well as an invaluable warning about the exorbitant price that the Fates always charge for human hubris.
This activity can also restore and redeem the faithful remnants, the few “old faithful” of the West in the eyes of future generations, as they wonder with the narrative of the final showdown of the West. When the last wave finally breaks upon the great empire of the West, the New Atlantis, covering forever the Global Western Maritimeism 1, that has enslaved and destroyed much of the world for centuries, valuable knowledge and many profound ideas will be buried with it: Some record must therefore be preserved to explain why and how it met its end.
According to the axiom that History does not repeat itself, but simply rhymes with the past, an important fact that the “old believers” of the West and current dissidents must record is that, even as the Thalassocratic rulers of New Atlantis have gone off course while simultaneously attempting to distort and appropriate for their own benefit the historical record of the Third Reich, the “Fourth Reich” of the Neo-Atlanteans is in fact the complete opposite of its supposed predecessor, both in intent and in substance.
By misleadingly presenting the historical reality of the Third Reich [i.e. distorting how the Third Reich emerged as a reaction to the first, early-globalized tyranny of the “banksters”, which was imposed on Europe after World War I, but also the way in which it collapsed from Anglo-Saxon diplomatic entrapment, media frenzy, military provocations, starvation blockade and terrorist bombings] and at the same time…. adopting ideas and methods of the Third Reich (racial supremacy, technological totalitarianism, manipulation of the media, ethnic cleansing and systematic genocide), the rulers of the Neo-Atlantean “New World Order”, with this combined action, simultaneously achieve their two objectives:
(1) As heirs to the Anglo-Saxon co-victors of World War II, they claim and proclaim the legitimacy of their world-empire, at home, and
(2) As conquerors of the conquered defeated Axis states, they appropriate the prestige, the territory of the Axis, in order to conduct “policing actions” abroad.
Thus, New-Atlantis has achieved a completely false, but-so far-essentially unchanged legitimacy at home, as well as a significant geopolitical and military advantage over the two major nation-states that had the greatest contributions and the greatest sacrifices to achieve the defeat of the Axis: Russia in the European Theater and China in the Asian Theater.
As for Europe, it is a given that there is a historiographical distortion and cultural appropriation and exploitation of all things related to the Third Reich and its many European allies (which included key members of the elites and masses of sympathizers throughout Western and Central Europe, including the formally “allied” and “neutral” states). This state of affairs explains the dual, physical and psychological, subordinate position that the states of Continental Europe (the EU and NATO) occupy vis-à-vis the Anglo-Saxon center of power of the New Atlantis “Five Eyes”2.
There will be no “awakening” and “revolution” in Continental Europe as long as the distorted historical record is not put in order and as long as the false Atlantic narrative is not eliminated. If there is a “Soft Power” initiative, the Eurasian East and the Global South can profitably pursue a stance against the European part of the Globalizing West, if not for the sake of simple truth and for the sake of saving some souls, at least to weaken the ruling elite of this part, disrupting and interrupting its “narrative comfort” zone and destabilizing its vassal states. Therefore, the right thing to do is this: They should promote the whole truth about history, about World War II and the Third Reich.
This expression of truth can begin with the simple statement that, despite its supremacist hubris and genocidal fury, the doomed National Socialist Third Reich, almost ready in 1944 to meet its Nemesis, still appears as a …. beacon of health and honor, compared to the doomed Globalist “Fourth Reich” of 2024, which may also meet its Nemesis.
While the Axis powers of the 1940s still claimed to be fighting for the sovereign rights of their nations and the future well-being of their peoples, and to be guided by a sense of historical mission and larger vision (however short-sighted and blinkered this may appear in retrospect), no such claims can be made by the Neo-Atlantean powers of the 2020s.
New Atlantis is determined to destroy all true nation-states and all authentic national identities because they are incompatible with its international supranational agenda for global “Full Spectrum Dominance” 3.
It is also fiercely opposed to any reductive mission and any transcendental vision for any human collectivity or individual, because its mission and vision are essentially intended and aimed at the post-human and ultimately, anti-human.
The socio-political program of Neo-Alantida for the dissolution of all forms of authentic religion, culture, hierarchy of birth, family and gender, is encountered as a logically necessary complement to its geopolitical program, the dissolution of all forms of authentic nation-state, authentic national sovereignty and national identity. Compared to the various demonic, anti-human sociopolitical and geopolitical programs of the New Atlantis of the 2020s, [which include the planned mass murder of the most vulnerable and innocent (“abortion”, “euthanasia”), the systematic mutilation and manipulation of the young (“gender transition”, “LGBTQ rights”), the effective tolerance of the sickest perversions (“pedophilia”, “bestiality”, “sex industry”), and the cognitively disharmonious normalization of legalized torture and cruelty (“industry” in the animal realm, “single motherhood” in the social realm, “vaccine mandates” in the medical realm)], those of the Axis powers of the 1940s, however monstrously cruel and wrong were, concerned those then considered “foreigners”, and are distinguished as indicators of a relatively rational collective life that they sought for their citizens.
The truth of this comparison is confirmed by the unparalleled ferocity with which the “Fourth Reich” of Neo-Atlanteanism is currently fighting its enemies, whom it simply cannot accept as equals or even as ..fellow-humans. It cannot tolerate any comparison or any competition, because such a thing exposes it for what it is, namely a real empire incompatible with the continued existence of anything defined as “humanity” throughout recorded history. Whenever it has to face any comparison and any competition, the “Fourth Reich” simply has no choice but to resort to denial. This explains the unparalleled total crackdown and near-universal censorship imposed on any alternative narrative by either dissidents at home or enemies abroad.
As their narrative is attacked in multiple “hybrid” wars, fought with an increasing number of enemies abroad and simultaneously on multiple “multi-dimensional” fronts, (from the Bloody Lands of Little Russia/Ukraine to the Holy Lands of the Near East and to the Pacific Rim in the Far East), the best the Globalizing leaders of New Atlantis can do is impose total censorship on dissidents at home, until all their challengers abroad are eliminated. But the longer this enclosed “bubble life” lasts, the more energy is required to prevent reality from penetrating it, and the greater the discrepancy between the internal “virtual reality” and the external “kinetic reality.”
Long before the last wave of reality crushes the bubble life, the West will have already completed its final descent into madness.
NOTES
1. Thalassocracy means “state by the sea” or “state of the sea”, and is most associated with the ancient Mediterranean world, where several societies used the sea very effectively to expand and project their influence. Since then, it has been applied more broadly to societies adjacent to the sea and to maritime empires of different regions and periods. Athens and Carthage stand out from the ancient world, while the British Empire is perhaps the archetypal modern example. Empire is an important clarifying lens through which to study the broader role of the seas and oceans in historical development.
The term thalassocracy was used in a strategic sense by the naval theorist Alfred Thayer Mahan, referring to states, regions, or leaders that controlled or dominated a large area of the sea or possessed naval supremacy, either in a commercial or military sense. [Alfred Thayer Mahan: The Influence of Sea Power in History 1660-1783 (Boston, Little, Brown & Company, 1890)]. In short, it describes a political entity that uses its navy and/or merchant marine to assert, assert, and project its power and to unite its possessions separated by water. Examples of thalassocracy include Athens, Venice, and the Dutch Republic. The great modern scholar of seapower states, Andrew Lambert, argues that true seapowers are the product of conscious cultural and political decisions by an entire society, [Andrew Lambert, “Seapower States: Maritime Civilization, Continental Empires, and the Conflict That Created the Modern World” (Yale University Press, 2018)]. As such, seapowers understand the asymmetry of power in the global power game between a seapower, such as Great Britain, and a continental hegemon, such as Napoleon’s France.
For the detailed cultural and historical analysis of the author of the article, Alexander Wolfhetze, on the origins of the contemporary Western Neo-Atlantean empire in the earlier “Global Modernist Seaocracy”, led by the Anglo-Saxons, see his work “A Traditionalist History of the Great War – Volume 2” (Cambridge Scholars, Newcastle upon Tyne, 2020), from page 70 onwards.
2. The Five Eyes (abbreviated FVEY) is an intelligence alliance of the Anglosphere, comprising Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States. These countries are additional signatories to the now multilateral and originally US-British AUKUS agreement, a treaty for joint cooperation in the field of intelligence. Informally, the Five Eyes can also refer to the group of intelligence services of these countries. The term Five Eyes originated as an abbreviation for a security classification “AUS/CAN/NZ/UK/US Eyes Only”.
The Anglosphere is a group of English-speaking nations with British cultural roots and centered on the United States, which today maintain close cultural, political, diplomatic and military cooperation. There are varying opinions about which nations it actually includes, but the Anglosphere is not usually considered to include all countries where English is the official language. The nations usually included were once part of the British Empire.
The term covers the United States, Canada (except Quebec), Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom, i.e. states that in the post-imperial era maintain close cultural and political ties with each other. Common ties include the recognition of King Charles III as head of state and the use of the British parliamentary system of government. Following the UK’s decision to leave the European Union in a 2016 referendum, there has been political and popular support for the formation of a free movement and common market area between Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom, known as CANZUK.
All these countries agree on some common programs, such as the US-British “UKUSA Agreement” (signals information), the aforementioned “Five Eyes” (security information of all kinds), the “Combined Communications Electronics Board” (electronics – communications), the “Technical Cooperation Program” (technology and science), the “Air and Space Interoperability Council” (air forces), AUSCANNZUKUS (naval forces), and the military cooperation program “ABCA Armies”, which concerns interoperability and the standardization of training and equipment of the armed forces of these countries.
The term can also include a number of Commonwealth countries in the Caribbean Sea, where English is widely spoken, including Jamaica, Barbados and the Commonwealth of the Bahamas.
In September 2021, with the creation of a defence cooperation agreement between Australia, the UK and the US (AUKUS), some internationalists and geopolitical analysts, as well as a few politicians, believed that the “Anglosphere” was returning or expanding to the East. AUKUS is a trilateral security cooperation focused on Australia’s acquisition of nuclear-powered attack submarines.
3. “Full Spectrum Dominance”, also known as “Full-Spectrum Superiority”, is the achievement of a military organization to control all dimensions of the battlefield, successfully disposing of an overwhelming variety of resources in areas such as land, air, sea, underground, extraterrestrial, psychological and bio-technological or cyber-technological warfare. “Full Spectrum Dominance” includes the physical battlefield. That is, the atmosphere, the earth’s surface and subsurface, as well as the electromagnetic spectrum and the information space. Control implies that the freedom of the opposing force to exploit the battlefield is completely limited.
