Trudeau leaves, FPO comes in EU, new political order emerges

Two major developments, seemingly unrelated to each other, namely Justin Trudeau’s resignation from the leadership of the Canadian government party and the mandate to form a government to the Austrian patriotic “Freedom Party” (FPÖ) of Herbert Kickl, come to confirm that the new year will continue on the path it set in 2024: the planet will continue to… take it further and further to the right and turn its back on the liberal elites, who plunged it into wars and economic crises.

Europe is turning to the right side of History: The Austrian FPO comes to strengthen the Fico – Orban alliance

In particular, in Austria the rise of the “Freedom Party” (FPÖ) of Herbert Kickl opens a strategic incision in the heart of Europe and of course in the pro-war strategy of the EU. The FPÖ won the election with 29% in September, but other political forces in Austria refused to form a coalition with it.

Outgoing Chancellor Nehammer tried to form a government, but negotiations he initiated with the Socialists and the NEOS party failed last week. After this failure, Nehammer announced his resignation.

The Austrian President suggested that Nehammer’s People’s Party, whose leadership he also left, could join a coalition with the FPÖ. Van der Bellen believes that a new path has now opened up “that did not exist before.” Herbert Kickl is known, among other things, for his pro-Russian stance and his tough policy on immigration.

In addition, the FPÖ is opposed to arms shipments to Ukraine and sanctions against Russia. This position brings it closer to its allies in the right-wing populist coalition in the European Parliament, in particular the Hungarian Fidesz party of Viktor Orban and the Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico.

Strengthening the Visegrad Group

In parallel, the FPO will seek Austria’s membership of the Visegrad Group, a group of central and eastern European countries that oppose the European Union’s plans for refugees and migrants. The eurosceptic leaders of Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic and Slovakia refuse to accept or implement the mandatory refugee redistribution quotas that the EU adopted after pressure from Western European countries.

They also reject proposals for EU reforms that would cede more of the member states’ national sovereignty to Brussels.

How Trump changed the balance in Canada and “resigned” Trudeau

On the other side of the Atlantic, the situation in Canada is no less interesting. President Trudeau’s resignation from the Liberal government party is inextricably linked to the election of Donald Trump to the presidency of the United States.

Trump openly mocks Trudeau, pejoratively calling him “the governor of the state.” That is, he puts him at the level of a regional manager who has also lost all trust from the center. It is clear that Canada’s dependence on the United States is enormous.

And Trump continues to threaten to introduce 25% tariffs and lead to the collapse of the Canadian economy, or more precisely, to throw Trudeau, who cannot cope with the challenges of the time and who does not understand its spirit, from the corridors of power.

Anglo-Saxons seem to be returning to the nation-state and rejecting globalization

The liberal trend that has dominated the last thirty years is no longer in fashion, Trump categorically declares, pointing to Trudeau, whose popularity is rapidly collapsing.

He is already below the poll ratings not only of conservatives, but also of left-wing Democrats. And in the case of Canada, Trump also has his own man – the conservative leader Pierre Poilievre, who with the slogan “Canada First” directly imitates his American idol. So, next year (the elections in Canada are in 2025) the situation may be as follows: America, Canada and Britain “above all” as the leading ideology and political line of the entire Anglo-Saxon world.

No, it will not be destruction, but rather its purification and reassembly, a popular revolution and the return of the Anglo-Saxons to traditional patriotism, a resounding rejection of globalization.

The Liberal International hands over the keys to the planet – Trump and Putin are the new bosses

All of the above developments indicate a changing of the guard in global governance. The fuse of this political change, however, was none other than the war in Ukraine, which revealed contradictions and exposed the fraudulent plans of the liberal elites against Russia.

However, now its leaders are paying the price for their warmongering stance, resulting in the collapse of the Liberal International that fought Putin, The three big “hawks” of Ukraine, US President Joe Biden, his French counterpart Emmanuel Macron and the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Rishi Sunak, have come or will come – sooner or later – face their political extinction.

  • Rishi Sunak resigned, leading with slow but steady steps towards his political vaporization.
  • French President Macron is also on hot coals, after the successive political defeats he suffered from the French opposition, with the collapse of his elected governments.
  • Then the most significant examples of political and diplomatic immoderation, US President Joe Biden and Vice President Harris, who were soundly defeated by Donald Trump.
  • The latest victim of his immoderation was the extreme liberal prime minister of Canada, who is slowly and painfully approaching his political end.

Who is left?

The … “materially responsible”, the one responsible for the crushing of the Ukrainian people, Volodymyr Zelensky, whose five-year term as president has expired -constitutionally- as of May 20, 2024, who is in political vertigo anyway, as the orgy of rumors about his possible replacement by Ukraine’s Western allies rages.

About the author

The Liberal Globe is an independent online magazine that provides carefully selected varieties of stories. Our authoritative insight opinions, analyses, researches are reflected in the sections which are both thematic and geographical. We do not attach ourselves to any political party. Our political agenda is liberal in the classical sense. We continue to advocate bold policies in favour of individual freedoms, even if that means we must oppose the will and the majority view, even if these positions that we express may be unpleasant and unbearable for the majority.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *