In the shadowy light of the aforementioned different approaches and personalities of the opponents, it becomes apparent that these were perhaps the most crucial elections since the end of the Second World War, because their multifaceted effects will be immediate, medium-term and long-term, numerous and very powerful.
It is absolutely clear that we are now talking about the most important elections in the USA and for the USA, but also for the entire world. It is worth looking back in history to the infamous Crash of 1929, precisely because there are, as then, all these dynamic, interactive bipolars and all their compromise interactive up-down compensations (“trade-offs” in Americanism) that are taking place today. That is, indeed, the triumphant winner of the elections will lead the entire planet, directly or indirectly, into an “other universe”. This is self-evident, as is the fact that ultimately there are two major poles of Globalization.
We will not hastily say that the re-elected President Trump “is not a globalizer”, in the sense that he is in fact a man of the System, although they say that … he is not of the System, it does not matter that he is a man with a fortune of 10 billion dollars and … he is also traced in films of the 80s playing a role in “Home Alone” (the unforgettable comedy “Home Alone”).
Of course, he is a man of the post-war System, but at the same time he represents another type of Globalization. What is said in international relations, that there is a world that is being led to a state of “Globalization with Chinese characteristics”, with characteristics of ethnocentric “communist capitalism”, does indeed exist or rather coexists with the case of President Trump. He is trying to lead Globalization to an obviously globalized world, but with American characteristics.
That is, “with the simplest way of thinking and acting on all issues” (“back to basics”), so that the world can return to a type of Globalization, where the concept of the nation-state, the concept of inviolable borders, will indeed exist “in reality” and of course big capital will operate, but in each homeland under one flag. (each with its own flag) and not as an anti-national parasitic offshoot of international exploiters and their local agents.
On the contrary, what Mrs. Harris unabashedly and militantly represented is the “globalization par excellence” of the stateless, the outright ethnonihilators, the promoters and servants of the financial banking establishment, the “caviar-eating” social communism and the huge multinational dividend holders of world wealth.
So we find ourselves before two types of Globalization, without being able to clearly state that one is “homeland and family” without anything else and the other is the complete, blatantly anational Globalization. Given two types of Globalization, Trump is trying to make Globalization what it was originally [let us not delude ourselves, Globalization came with the American Great Power, the US Superpower, in its “unipolar moment”]. This is roughly the type of Globalization that Bush the Elder announced in the phase where the Soviet Union was faltering. This Globalization … got lost along the way.
Obviously, in Globalization, and before it evolved into the current frenzied internationalized model, multi-level “annoying” or “problematic” characteristic paraphernalia were already manifested, such as the protective tariffs of global transactions that function as “trade wars” between states, characteristics that we actually had to see before the real conflicts of the Great Powers appeared. Therefore, in order for the winner Trump to restore the international event to the previous model, he must somehow stop the current one and “convert” it back to the previous one.
So in order to achieve his dynamic slogan “MAGA – Make America Great Again” he must first reindustrialize his America somewhat. Secondly, it must be able to de facto lead the economic situation to a cheaper dollar, because although it declares various seductive and abstract economic futures, the reserve of the American economy must be kept sufficient. In addition, however, it must also try to somehow change the … course of the boastful Titanic of the USA.
Consequently, the protectionism that Trump repeatedly mentions is obviously “tariff for tariff” (which he has literally mentioned) in the “eye for an eye” manner, towards the competitors of the USA. This is a way, as he understands it, for the return of American power, for the “re-establishment” of America, so that it can balance in the current global power situation. So there are indeed two trends of Globalization, in which all the opposing bipolarities mentioned above are obviously included. All of these things that are essentially related to the homeland or the stateless, to the national culture or the impoverished anti-national consumerist mob…etc. “of which there is no number”, so for this reason the transatlantic electoral battle that we watched was indeed the “Mother of all battles”.
In any case, this statement does not concern an impressive title, it is the reality, it really happened. This was the bloodless political “Mother of battles”, as the event will continue to unfold: The world will not be the same after Trump won. Now the opposing forces that exist at this moment and are trying to control global events and spread victoriously across the planet, will have no rest. We must not forget for any reason that after Harris, Mrs. Obama, or the corresponding “Mrs. Obama,” will likely come as the “promoter” and champion of the Woke Agenda.
We may therefore see a “tsunami of undermining and overthrow” in this direction, which of course will not be able to change this new salutary direction at least in the foreseeable future, so Trump’s victory is indeed very important and of course we have a duty to investigate specific possible aspects of it such as foreign policy.
Indeed, the case of Trump represents another version of Globalization and indeed what has happened with this recent conflict, characteristically concerns an elite that is being pushed aside and an elite that is coming, but the previous one cannot accept that it will be replaced by another. The upcoming event will (moreover) be a multifaceted war of the ruling elites.
Also another element is that, the current Globalization shows some signs of retreat, but retreat in the sense that we have now moved to a “regionalization” of its action and mainly we are moving towards a revitalization and return of the nation-state to the USA, at least in key sectors. We see for example that production in critical fields and issues is returning to the USA, such as in issues related to medicines, in issues related to energy and in other key issues. We have seen this mainly from 2020 onwards, due to economic overgrowth and the manifested “mild” rivalry from China. So there is already an active process, the opposite of what has happened so far, which is sufficiently targeted.
A second point is that what Trump represents politically is a peculiar “liberal nationalism”, which also involves several aspects of a globalized economy and globalized politics, but in a different form, where precisely the most important thing is the “regional” or even “territorial” element of international relations, therefore the specific form of Globalization sought will be different.
And this certainly creates “camps”, that is, it creates large aggregations which will constitute a system very similar to the situation we have now. Will the coming new world be bipolar, will it be multipolar or will it be bipolar with hybrid characteristics? In any case, speaking primarily with realism, we are first referring to the current bipolar world, but containing emerging powers that are creating their own spheres of influence or trying to create and operate independently. Therefore, very soon there will be at least a “hybrid bipolarity”.
Thus, as such a System will operate on a political level, economically there will obviously be related movements. It is naturally impossible to go back to the past “well-established”, but due to technology these camps will be absolutely “watertight”. This cannot be done and in the final analysis no one would want it to be done, but this way it will become clear who is with whom and who moves with whom.
For example, from the imminent governmental differentiation of American policy, the multi-level “supply chains” will change and be transferred. The involved responsible for this case will seek in every way what we call “restoration – repaint – revitalization” – of the United States. Such an event with supply chains generally involves a laborious effort: How should they be transported, who should control the raw materials, where should we take the factories, how exactly will the whole process be completed …. so we will be led to a different type of globalized situation which will however basically be a “regional globalization”, that is, it will be something like the European Union.
Consequently, “camps” of interests, political and ideological views and worldviews will be created. So, since Trump was elected, obviously the various stakeholders must talk to Trump and talk to him. But the Democrats are very keen to get more involved with Russia in some way, so Russia will reasonably move closer to China.
That is, the System will become more “bipolar,” so the “so to speak” camps will become more apparent and there will be a clear difference between “here” and “there.” Of course, with President Trump, there will be various newly formed camps with interconnected relationships similar to 19th-century Europe, the Europe of the great Bismarck, that is, with various bilateral alliances, with some particular transnational combinations, but also with cooperative national “triangles.”
