What can the “Deep state” do until 74 days have passed since Trump took office?

The predominance of Donald Trump and the Republicans, over Kamala Harris and the Democrats, is a fact. The current Vice President of the USA and the loser of the election, avoided admitting the result of the election that same night but the next day she was forced to keep up the pretenses and spoke – as usual – at a gathering of her group.

There an “other” Kamala was introduced. The stupid laugh was gone from her. Apparently, even a person with her IQ understood that she lost. But her speech is indicative of what the Democratic camp is planning. After underlining that “she is obliged by the democratic rules to accept the result of the elections and that is the only reason she is doing it”, she continued in an angry tone and said that she will never leave “the fight for freedom” that she started.

And just like that, the nearly 70-day journey of the President-elect and his team begins, until he is installed in the White House and holds the reins of the country.

But until then, a lot can happen. We consider it to be the most dangerous period, in the “West Wing” in general.

Democrats have threatened many times that they will not hand over power easily. There are not a few journalists who speak in very hostile language about Trump, there are not a few entangled politicians and tycoons who risk losing a lot of money and a lot of power if the Trump administration implements the agenda for which it was elected.

Certainly in the White House, in the first press conference after the defeat, the openly gay Karine Jean-Pierre, said that Biden is determined that the decision of the people will be respected and there will be a smooth transition of power. But, apart from the official ones, the unofficial ones also play a role…

Let’s not forget that death already came very close to the new President. Surely his security will be increased and upgraded now that he is elected, but again: Maybe

  • will he rise enough to face the risk of promising to open the J.F.Kennedy assassination file? Will it be upgraded enough to counter the threat of the promise to end the enormous influence of pharmaceutical companies on US health care policy?
  • Not to mention the dangers of announcing a total overhaul of the state apparatus or disengagement from chronic wars.

Undoubtedly the Democratic camp is overrun with the full gamut of morons. All key positions are occupied by convenient incompetents who are not at all in real contact with political reality. We refer to the political minds who, for example, put mobile abortion crews outside the Democratic convention and the electoral geniuses who missed a super-huge opportunity to win the election by tackling the big issue of natural disasters in North Carolina with swift energy and humanity. but also to the failed technocrats who while the Harris campaign raised $1 billion (!) for the campaign, they managed not only to lose but also to find themselves in debt of 20 million!!!

But it is not these minds that will bring the problems to the change of power. The problems will be brought by their bosses. The managers of the big pharma companies and the heads of the military industrial lobby. And of course they will use the secret services that always act….for the good of democracy…

To get a sense of the scale of the problem, see an exclusive story from the Daily Mail, particularly disturbing and indicative of the incompetence and serious political myopia of the Democrats: just hours after the polls close in the US, a hypersonic nuclear missile test is planned by the Pentagon!

The superpowers are literally on the brink of nuclear war, and the Pentagon chooses this day and time for an extremely dangerous and inexplicable military challenge…

So the second Trump Presidency lands in a world different from the first. Today, the US has lost its imperial stamp. There is no global pole. The mismanagement of the conditions that once left the US a monopolist on the planet, gave rise to critical changes.

Today, the superpower of the USA certainly exists, but the second pole has also fully matured, that of the close alliance between Russia and China and the broader alliance of the former with Iran, India and B. Korea. There is also the deadly weapon of the dollar, the BRICS.

The USA, as the leading country of the West, has detached itself from the “American dream”. It became a tyrannical force, which for money and only for money, abuses, kills, blackmails, steals, lies. It’s clearly a trans-gangster force. But it is equally clear that no one outside the circle of the subjugated west would tolerate this, for long.

The narcissism of political dwarfs, the persecution of values, the decadence and suffocating corruption cultivated in the USA, structural features of a rotten society, which also became exportable products in Europe, could not be accepted for much longer.

The “other pole” does not naturally consist of saints or angels. For now, however, it is raising the banner of unhooking from total corruption and from woke perversion.

Do not doubt that the conflict is upon us. Either it will be done on the terms of the Democrats’ paranoia or on the terms of the “common sense” preached by Donald Trump’s political movement.

We must fully understand that the coming conflict is primarily a capital clash of civilizations. And we must not forget that Greece is a cultural superpower.

The present indescribable state of decline of the west, in addition to the universal fiasco of the systems that the post-war period of the 20th century highlighted, also reveals the timeless need for nations to use the historical code as a guide for the future. Culture is not transmitted, it is conquered.

About the author

The Liberal Globe is an independent online magazine that provides carefully selected varieties of stories. Our authoritative insight opinions, analyses, researches are reflected in the sections which are both thematic and geographical. We do not attach ourselves to any political party. Our political agenda is liberal in the classical sense. We continue to advocate bold policies in favour of individual freedoms, even if that means we must oppose the will and the majority view, even if these positions that we express may be unpleasant and unbearable for the majority.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *