The Unique, Mythical Wines and the “Bad Wine”

Every century has its successful harvests and legendary wines. The following wines are found in the pantheon of the 20th century:

• Chateau Margoux (1900),

• Bollinger (1911),

• La Romanee (1921),

• Chateau d`Yquem (1921),

• Salon (1928),

• Chateau Latour (1928),

• Chateau Mission Haut-Brion (1929),

• La Tache (1937),

• Chateau Mouton-Rothschild (1945),

• Chateau Cheval Blanc (1947),

• Chateau de Fesles (1947),

• Musigny (1949),

• Chateau Lafite-Rothschild (1959),

• Chateau Latour (1961),

• Clos des Goisses (1975),

• Rayas (1978),

• Petrus (1982),

• Chateau Le Pin (1982),

• Chateau Leoville-Las-Cases (1982),

• Dom Perignon (1985),

• Chateau Haut-Brion (1989),

The “Bad Wine”

It is much easier to explain what is considered bad wine than to give the definition of good wine. “Bad” wine is one that immediately shows disadvantages, which make it unpleasant in taste and even unsuitable for consumption. The wine lover, even if he is a beginner, discovers it quite easily.

A cloudy wine, an unsuitable nose with unpleasant odors, an aggressive acidity, a hot feeling of alcohol, an intense astringency, a bad taste and so on. These are just some of the goal setting shareware that you can use at least once. The most common causes of such phenomena are the late or early harvest, the poorly cared for winemaking, the cultivation of grapes that was done carelessly or that was not adapted to the quality of the raw material.

However, the lack of disadvantages is not the only condition for the production of a good wine. A technically good wine can prove to be ordinary, because it can not cause the slightest pleasure, the slightest emotion.

About the author

The Liberal Globe is an independent online magazine that provides carefully selected varieties of stories. Our authoritative insight opinions, analyses, researches are reflected in the sections which are both thematic and geographical. We do not attach ourselves to any political party. Our political agenda is liberal in the classical sense. We continue to advocate bold policies in favour of individual freedoms, even if that means we must oppose the will and the majority view, even if these positions that we express may be unpleasant and unbearable for the majority.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *