Europe has a long and bloody history. Empires have risen and fallen, wars have repeatedly redefined national borders and the human cost has been unspeakably high. Yet today in the European Union we are all “united in diversity”, these three short words tell us exactly what to think.
No expense was spared in hiring a top PR firm to come up with this clever Orwellian slogan which, like Big Brother, works to brainwash the masses into believing that we are indeed stronger together, based on a “many heads are better than one” scenario.
For now, let’s take a very short trip back in time to the 1920s, when an Austro-Japanese named Count Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi (of Byzantine descent) co-founded the Pan-European Union in 1922 with Archduke Otto von Habsburg. Both men were Freemasons. The following year, Kalergi published the manifesto, Pan-Europa, in which he wrote: “The greatest obstacle to the achievement of a United States of Europe is the thousand-year-old rivalry between the two most populous nations of Europe: Germany and France.”
After reading Pan-Europa, the German-Jewish banker and Freemason Max Warburg contacted fellow Freemason Baron Louis de Rothschild to facilitate a meeting with Kalergi, a meeting that resulted in Warburg donating 60,000 marks (a huge sum for the time) to finance the movement for three years. This was done in early 1924. A year later, in 1925, Warburg arranged for Kalergi to travel to the United States to meet his brother Paul Warburg and the Jewish-American financier Bernard Baruch. That same year, Kalergi published the book Praktischer Idealismus (Practical Idealism).
Marian Mihaila, Assistant Grand Master of Romanian Freemasonry, writes in the Fall 2006 issue of the Masonic Forum: “Kalergi was encouraged and financed by a number of American Freemasons who wanted to create, according to the American model, the first Masonic state in history, the United States of Europe.
An interesting footnote is that Max Warburg’s financing of the Pan-Europa movement came just seven years after he had collaborated with Kaiser Wilhelm II and the German High Command to orchestrate Lenin’s return to Russia on a sealed train in April 1917. Lenin and his fellow exiles on the train carried $6 million in gold to finance the overthrow of the Provisional Government of Russia.
Paul Warburg’s brother-in-law, Jacob Schiff, a Jewish-American banker and head of the New York investment firm Kuhn, Loeb and Company, was another financier of the Bolshevik Revolution, donating $20 million to the cause and financing Leon Trotsky’s return to Russia in March 1917. We note that Trotsky was a Ukrainian Jew born Lev Davidovich Bronstein.
An interesting footnote is that Max Warburg’s funding of the Pan-Europa movement came just seven years after he worked with Kaiser Wilhelm II and the German High Command to orchestrate Lenin’s return to Russia on a sealed train in April 1917. Lenin and his fellow exiles on the train carried $6 million in gold to finance the overthrow of the Russian Provisional Government.
Paul Warburg’s brother-in-law, Jacob Schiff, a Jewish-American banker and head of the New York investment firm Kuhn, Loeb and Company, was another financier of the Bolshevik Revolution, donating $20 million to the cause and financing Leon Trotsky’s return to Russia in March 1917. We note that Trotsky was a Ukrainian Jew born Lev Davidovich Bronstein.
Thus, in the early 20th century, the Wall Street capitalists not only financed a movement to unite all the countries of Western Europe, but also financed communism, which, as we know, united all the countries of Eastern Europe under the Soviet Union.
In 1923, Trotsky wrote an article in Pravda entitled, “Is the Time Ripe for the Slogan: The United States of Europe?”, in which he stated: “Europe will be able not only to preserve itself, but also to consolidate and build itself, as soon as it breaks down the customs barriers and unites economically with the inexhaustible natural wealth of Russia. The United States of Europe, a purely revolutionary prospect, is the next stage in our generally revolutionary prospect.”
In addition to being supported by Jewish bankers, Kalergi was also supported by Austrian Freemasons. The March 1925 issue of the Masonic magazine The Beacon reported: “Freemasonry, especially Austrian Freemasonry, can be extremely pleased to have Coudenhove-Kalergi among its members. Austrian Freemasonry can rightly say that Brother Coudenhove-Kalergi is fighting for its pan-European convictions. Brother Kalergi’s program is a Masonic work of the highest order, and to be able to work together on it is a high task for all brother Masons” (Kalergi joined the Masonic Lodge in Vienna in 1921).
Freemasons were also working on other fronts towards a united Europe. In September 1929, Freemason Aristide Briand, the French Foreign Minister, gave a speech to the League of Nations (the forerunner of the United Nations) in which he proposed the establishment of a federal European Union. The basis of his plan was economic, but its fundamental goal was political union.
Since Kalergi moved in aristocratic and political circles, his ideas attracted European heads of state as supporters and collaborators, as well as well-known figures such as Sigmund Freud, Thomas Mann and Albert Einstein, all Freemasons. In 1926, the first pan-European meeting was held in Vienna with 2,000 participants. At this meeting Kalergi was elected president of the Central Council, a position he held for 49 years, until his death in 1972. (He was succeeded by Otto von Habsburg.)
The Jewish Telegraphic Agency reported the following about the meeting: “Several Jewish European leaders played a prominent part in the first Pan-European Congress which opened here on Sunday, when the movement for the establishment of a United States of Europe, on the model of the United States of America, took definite shape… Many individual European Jews are promoting the Pan-European movement by giving it financial support. Count Coudenhove-Kalergi, who is married to Ida Roland, a Jewess, when questioned by the Jewish Telegraphic Agency spokesman, expressed the view that the Pan-European movement should find special support on the part of the Jews scattered throughout the various countries of Europe. The creation of the United States of Europe would be beneficial to the Jews, as it would eliminate racial hatred and economic competition.”
Kalergi promoted his pan-European vision by proposing Beethoven’s “Ode to Joy” as the European anthem (1929) and an annual designated Europe Day (1930). Beyond these two proposals adopted by the present-day European Union, Kalergi’s influence not only on its formation but also on the form of the Union cannot be underestimated.
His original vision was of a world divided into just five states:
- The United States of Europe that would link the continental countries with the French and Italian possessions in Africa,
- a Pan-American Union that would include North and South America,
- the British Commonwealth throughout the world,
- the USSR that would cover Eurasia, and
- a Pan-Asian Union where Japan and China would control most of the Pacific.
The movement towards this vision accelerated after World War II, drawing international support from Winston Churchill to Harry S. Truman, both 33rd degree Masons. In December 1945 Kalergi wrote an article that was published in Collier’s magazine in the US. Impressed by the ideas expressed in the article, Truman adopted as a policy the promotion of a United States of Europe.
To this end, the American Committee on United Europe was created in 1948, with William Donovan, the wartime head of the Office of Strategic Services (forerunner of the CIA), appointed as chairman, and Allen Dulles (director of the CIA, 1953-61) as vice chairman. The ACUE financed the European movement to a large extent, with further covert funding channeled through the Rockefeller Foundation. Behind the scenes, the Council on Foreign Relations and the Bilderberg Group also supported a united Europe, with the former supporting the idea of a single currency as early as 1955.
In Europe, during a speech in Zurich in September 1946, Churchill stressed the following: “We must build a kind of United States of Europe… Much work has been done on this project by the efforts of the Pan-European Union, which owes so much to Count Coudenhove-Kalergi… The structure of the United States of Europe, if well and truly built, will be such as to make the material strength of any single state less important. Small nations will count as much as large ones and will gain their honor by their contribution to the common cause… The first step is the creation of a Council of Europe. If at first all the states of Europe are not willing or unable to join the Union, we must nevertheless proceed to gather and unite those who are willing and those who are able.”
A year later, in July 1947, Kalergi founded the European Parliamentary Union. The EPU, together with the European Movement, founded the same year by Churchill’s son-in-law, Duncan Sandys, played a leading role at the Hague Conference in May 1948. However, the European Movement overshadowed the EPU’s importance when it founded the Council of Europe in 1949, one of the seven major institutions of the European Union today. In 1950, the EPU merged with the European Movement, and Kalergi was elected honorary president in 1952.
That same year, Jean Monnet, president of the High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community (now the European Commission) from 1952 to 1955, wrote the following in a letter to a friend: “The nations of Europe must be led towards the superstate without their peoples understanding what is happening. This can be achieved by successive steps, each of which is disguised as having an economic purpose, but which will ultimately and irrevocably lead to federation.”
The Lisbon Treaty, which came into force in December 2009, was the culmination of the conspiracy to achieve a superstate in secrecy. While the gears continue to turn to bring every nation fully under the control of the European Union, the treaty, which contains the elements of the unratified 2004 European Constitution under a more palatable name, is a plan to consolidate power in the hands of the unelected few. Most importantly, it removes the veto power from national governments, while committing all countries to comply with and implement the policy approved by the same unelected few.
The European Union superstate is a stepping stone to global elite government. Paul Warburg’s son, James, speaking to the United States Senate in February 1950, said: “We are going to have World Government, whether we like it or not. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or by consent.” James Warburg’s statement is an extension of Kalergi’s vision of unifying the entire world into five states.
Within just ten years of the end of World War II, Kalergi’s initial initiative to create a united Europe had gained enormous international support and funding, both of which gave rise to even more initiatives, movements, and organizations, which were to become the defining feature of the European Union as we know it today.
There are currently seven main EU institutions: the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council of the European Union, the European Commission, the Court of Justice of the European Union (composed of three judicial bodies: the Court of Justice, the General Court and the Civil Service Tribunal), the European Central Bank (composed of the Executive Board, the Management Board, the General Board and the Supervisory Board) and the Court of Auditors.
In addition to the seven main institutions and their branches, there are currently 48 agencies, consisting of 37 decentralised agencies, six executive agencies, two Euratom (European Atomic Energy Community) agencies and three independent bodies. Of the 37 decentralised agencies, eleven were set up over a period of 24 years (1975-1999), while 26 were set up over a period of just eleven years (2011-12). Two more agencies were later included: the European Public Prosecutor’s Office and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency.
There are also two advisory committees, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, as well as the European Investment Bank. In addition, there are three interinstitutional bodies: the Publications Office, the European Personnel Selection Office and the European School of Public Administration and the European Anti-Fraud Office.
Then there is the European Civil Service, which consists of 34 directorates-general, which serves the European Commission. Then there is the General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union, which consists of seven directorates-general, which serves the Council of the European Union, the Presidency of the Council of the European Union, the European Council and the President of the European Council.
In addition to the enormous costs of maintaining this bureaucracy, from staff salaries and expenses to overheads in 98 EU buildings in Brussels and Strasbourg, thousands of reams of paper have been created to document the approximately 120,000 regulations and directives that make up European law, which significantly overrides the national law of each country within the European Union.
To exercise the Union’s powers, the institutions adopt regulations, directives, decisions, recommendations and opinions. A regulation has general application. It is binding in all parts of the EU and directly applicable in all Member States. A directive is binding, as to the result to be achieved, upon each Member State to which it is addressed, but leaves the choice of form and methods to the national authorities. A decision is binding in its entirety on those to whom it is addressed. Recommendations and opinions are not binding.
In June 2006, Vladimir Bukovsky, one of the most prominent dissidents of the Soviet Union, said the following about EU regulations in a speech in Brussels: “When you look at all this strange activity of the European Union with its 80,000 pages of regulations, it resembles Gosplan (the Soviet State Planning Committee). An organization that planned everything in the economy, down to the last nut, a few years earlier.” Bukovsky further draws parallels between the Soviet Union and the European Union, likening the European Parliament to the Supreme Soviet and the European Commission to the Politburo.
Bukowski continues: “If you go through all the structures and characteristics of this emerging European monster, you will notice that it looks more and more like the Soviet Union… Meanwhile, they are introducing more and more ideology. The Soviet Union was a state ruled by ideology. I am watching very closely how political correctness is spreading and becoming an oppressive ideology.
What Bukowski said about political correctness, i.e. racism, xenophobia, etc., could not be more timely today, as the manufactured migration crisis engulfs Europe and its countries, dividing people across the length and breadth of the Union. Just as Bukowski warned, those who disagree with further immigration are now portrayed as racist and/or xenophobic, often referred to as extremists, fascists or neo-Nazis. There is little rational discussion of the full implications of increased immigration. Instead, the mainstream media and politicians are quick to warn about the “dangers of the far right.”
Beyond the specifics of racism and xenophobia, broader laws on “hate speech” are being adopted by individual countries. Such laws are open to very different levels of interpretation and do not take into account religious beliefs or informed understanding and are therefore open to abuse. Given the increasing number of hate speech laws in recent years, it is very likely that the number of such laws and/or articles within these laws will continue to grow to cover every possible detail. At this point, the absurdity will not only be achieved, but will be maximized.
As a reminder: In January 2016, Facebook launched the Online Civil Courage Initiative, led by Jewish-German former Stasi agent Anetta Kahane, who in 1998 founded the Amadeu Antonio Stiftung (AAS) as “a response to the neo-Nazi subculture that permeates the former East Germany and has infiltrated the former West Germany.” AAS funders include Soros’ Open Society Foundations. George Soros (Hungarian-American-Jew) was a major financier of the color revolutions (such as in Kiev in 2014) and the Arab Spring that bloodied Libya, Syria, Egypt and Tunisia.
When Kahane was interviewed by Russia Today in 2010, she said the following about immigration to Europe: “Immigration is the future. You cannot work and live in a globalized world, in the middle of the world in Europe, without immigration and population movement. So you really need to have a good immigration policy across Europe. And we see that the history of Europe with its long history of nationalism and small countries is now entering a crisis, so it will take a long time to improve, but you really have to change the immigration policy within Europe. This is very important, you have to adapt the education system and adapt the whole self-understanding of states. They are no longer just white or just Swedes or just Portuguese or just Germans. They are multicultural places in the world.”
Today’s multinational European cities are a growing reflection of Kahane’s words and the following excerpt from Kalergi’s 1925 book, PraktischerIdealismus:
“The man of the future will be a mixed race. The present races and classes will disappear due to the disappearance of space, time and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in external appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a variety of individuals.”
Whether or not Kalergi advocated intermarriage or merely implied it as inevitable is not clear from the few available passages, but at this stage of the European game his intentions are irrelevant because the point has been made and imposed on a largely unsuspecting population through the EU’s current immigration policy.
In 1999, General Wesley Clark (of Belarusian-Jewish descent), NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander Europe (1997-2000), said: “There is no room in modern Europe for ethnically pure states. This is a 19th century idea and we are trying to bring it into the 21st century, but we will do it with multinational states.”
Furthermore, in a speech in September 2008, Nicolas Sarkozy (of Greek-Jewish origin) spoke of the necessity of intermarriage: “The goal is to face the challenge of racial intermarriage. The challenge of racial intermarriage that we face in the 20th century. It is not a choice, it is an obligation. It is an imperative. We cannot do otherwise. We risk being faced with major problems. We must change, therefore we will change. All at the same time. In business, in administration, in education, in political parties. And we will be obliged to the results. If this voluntariness does not work for Democracy, then the state will proceed to even more coercive measures.”
To support Sarkozy’s claims, here are some illuminating words from Kalergi’s Praktischer Idealismus: “To the extent that Europe is Christian, it is in the spiritual sense Jewish; to the extent that Europe is moral, it is Jewish… We are now on the threshold of the third era of modern times, socialism… This development, and with it the chaos of modern politics, will find its end only when an intellectual aristocracy seizes the means of power of society: gunpowder, gold, ink, and uses them for the blessing of the general public.”
Due to the constant brainwashing over the last few decades, many people still resist connecting the dots and refuse to see the picture that emerges, but the reality is that the very Jews whom Kalergi considered great and deeply valued not only supported and financed his initiatives, but also hold a disproportionate number of powerful positions in the European Union and its member states today. These positions are not only official at the EU and national government level, but also culturally influential, such as in the media, television, film industry, music industry, etc.
Social, cultural and economic change is enforced through legislation, regulations, policy directives, pressure groups and think tanks, change supported by the media, which also disseminates the approved thinking (ink). Economies are manipulated through central banks and the stock market (gold). And our inalienable rights are being subjugated through an ever-increasing number of tyrannical laws, backed by force (gunpowder) or the mere threat of force, which for the majority of people is all that is required to ensure compliance.
Europe today would be largely unrecognizable to those who lived in it in the middle of the last century. What we gained in open borders we lost in individual freedoms, as more and more aspects of our lives are subject to taxation, regulation, surveillance and political correctness.
The heterogeneity of our national cultures is progressively homogenizing. Corporate compliance regulations and EU economic policies are massively impacting businesses and economies, with many businesses, especially small ones, struggling to survive. Meanwhile, city centers are increasingly housing the same chain stores and cafes. Mass migration, combined with “replacement migration,” is rapidly changing the face of Europe, as ethnic Europeans become a minority in major European cities.
If we do not resist, what will life in Europe be like in ten, twenty, thirty years from now?
Given that the bureaucratic behemoth of the European Union will continue to move, creating ever more regulations and allowing many more immigrants to live and work within its borders, the result should come as no great surprise. The European Union will stifle what once defined Europe: the sovereignty of nations and the diversity of free peoples and cultures.
