The new Secretary General of NATO, Mark Rutte, told Zelensky: “Stop worrying about the possible election of Trump. I know him and it is certain that he is committed to the cause of Ukraine.”
From the first actions – responsibilities of the new G.G. is the conduct of the nuclear exercise “Steadfast Noon” in the coming days. An exercise that will take place mainly in the UK, Belgium, the Netherlands and the North Sea.
The purpose of the exercise is to prepare for a limited nuclear war by dropping tactical nuclear bombs from aircraft of the national air forces of NATO countries against targets in Russia. The exercises include test procedures related to the transfer from the storage facilities to the air forces of some NATO member states of the US B61-13 tactical nuclear bombs, which are stored at the airfields of several NATO countries and are under US control simulating a nuclear conflict with Russia and a limited nuclear war in Europe, these aerial bombs are transferred to the national air forces of the involved NATO member countries.
We note here the rumors that the outgoing G.G. NATO’s Jens Stoltenberg flirted with the idea of staying put, but was considered too soft-spoken (!) on what the United States plans for the immediate future. See how “mild” Stoltenberg was (“NATO escalates nuclear tensions with Russia“) to understand what we can expect from Rutte.
But let’s also look at the issue of NATO. It is clear that the “alliance” is the best justification for the presence of very strong US military forces in Europe. Through this cooperation, although the industrial production of weapons systems of some European countries is not suppressed, it is clear that American weapons – and only American ones – are sold to the majority of the 32 member countries. So NATO is the “corner store” for the promotion of the products of the American military industry. The sales and the need for the product are supported by the US, triggering unnecessary and dishonorable wars around the globe. Note here three very important factors:
- the US military industrial complex is not government but private
- while most of the US industrial production has been moved abroad (because supposedly it benefits the companies) the production of weapons is not done outside the US… probably the weapons companies are not interested in sustainable profits…
- no NATO member has sufficient munitions for a months-long war.
Somehow, the economy has become hostage to the arms industries and the ΄΄production of wars΄΄.
Before the war in Ukraine, the voices in Europe and also in the USA were growing as to the reason for the existence of NATO. Even Trump when he was President had expressed some discomfort. NATO was founded in April 1949 to protect Europe from the Soviet threat.
Yes (!) to protect against those the US over-armed in 1941-1945!!! Of those who were ordered to halt Paton’s army in order to get to Berlin first, thus setting the scene for the Cold War. To protect Europe from those Soviets, whom Paton fell out of favor (if not murdered) because he wanted to fight them and drive them out of Europe. If he had, there would have been no Cold War…
But the danger of the USSR disappeared in 1990. Thus the presence of NATO in Europe became at least strange. But the USA “discovered” the dangers in Yugoslavia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and so the allies had to fight again. When, over time, the truth about the monstrous lies fabricated wars spilled out, then the questioning of the reasons for NATO’s existence grew. And then appeared as if from a machine god, again the Russian danger…
So now NATO has not only a reason for existence but a very important reason, since as it does not stop warning us, it mainly protects Europe, because of its big good heart.
Today, it is clear to everyone that Russia is no longer the Soviet Union. It is a modern superpower with a strong national consciousness, a strong state-owned war industry, highly skilled diplomacy and a desire to abolish the world’s uni-polarity that resulted from the fall of the USSR and establish a multi-polarity, which will “country” the USA, Russia, China, India, the E.U. and the BRICS.
So NATO, as a sweaty and panicked card player, makes the fatal move and bluffs betting its change, simultaneously pushing the world towards nuclear annihilation.
It is now certain that in a nuclear conflict there will be no winners. Einstein was once asked about the third world war and the weapons that would be used and he replied that: “I don’t know about the third but the fourth will be fought with stones and axes”.
NATO experts are completely wrong to think (or hope) that they will be able to keep an upcoming nuclear engagement, firstly limited to tactical weapons and secondly off US soil. Both are excluded. Nuclear strikes in Ukraine or Russia will immediately drag China into war and the main target will no longer be European military bases but the main infrastructure of the USA.
Americans, unlike those who govern them, are an admirable people. But they have a basic combat disadvantage. They are horrified at the prospect of bringing war into US soil. Something that was clearly demonstrated with the attack on the Twin Towers. So with the first blows, American society will collapse. The corpses will no longer be television images from Gaza, Libya or Yemen but will be next to them, in front of them and real.
The leaders of NATO and the industrial weapons complex of the USA are aware of this reality, which is why they have been trying for years to silence news and images of dead American soldiers. This reality is also the Achilles heel of American power projection and proves NATO’s bluff regarding the nuclear threat.
Unless, of course, they manage to limit the blows within Europe. Then the channels in the USA will have a lot of material for American citizens and companies like BlackRock will have a lot of work to rebuild the devastated Europe…
