Since man has his health or his health problems can be addressed by giving\nhim a good quality of life, then the supreme good of all the goods that man can\nhave in his life is politics, not health. Because to offer solutions to the problems of your\nfellow human beings is considered the highest good, (Aristotle (384-322 B.C.)-The great Greek philosopher of antiquity).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
by Thanos S. Chonthrogiannis-https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n The ways to “regenerate” and redefine politics\nin the liberal world and not only<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n In this Part III, of our analysis will present both the strategies to be\nimplemented by the whole of the political world in order to bridge the existing\ngap between citizens and political parties, regenerating the very concept of\npolitics in today’s societies, and the benefits that citizens and political\nparties will have from the\napplication of these strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As we mentioned in a previous paragraph in the current era, a large\nmajority of citizens refrain from or abhor politics, and this is a sign that\nthe political party programs are not convincing to the citizens. <\/p>\n\n\n\n This is mainly because any differences in the programs of the political\nparties have almost been eliminated and are almost identical to most of the\nissues dealt with, while any remaining differences are exclusively and only\nadministrative character. <\/p>\n\n\n\n So, the fact that any differences in political parties have disappeared means that there is no fundamental conflict between the political parties in their programs and beliefs respectively. <\/p>\n\n\n\n This shows us that in every political party there is no one’s own perception of how a society should operate smoothly in order to achieve the common goal of social welfare, which social well-being should be diffused among all citizens irrespective of the size of their annual disposable income. <\/p>\n\n\n\n When we say the fight against political programs it means that political\nparties must have, and not necessarily, different positions and perceptions\nthat will be transformed into solid beliefs. <\/p>\n\n\n\n These beliefs and perceptions will in turn result from answers to questions\nof the type about how to achieve a better functioning and structuring of\nsociety in areas such as health, taxation and public services, the organization\nof Government, education, social insurance, migration, investments, public\norder etc. <\/p>\n\n\n\n The answers that will be given to such questions will also be the ones on\nwhich the detailed programs of the political parties should be drawn up.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So, questions such as the type:<\/p>\n\n\n\n 1. <\/strong>What is the difference between Republicans and Democrats in the health sector? Are these beliefs expressed by each party helping to ensure the proper functioning of society in order to achieve all together the common goal of social welfare? <\/p>\n\n\n\n If Yes, how this achieved? If No, what needs to be done and what policies should be implemented? <\/p>\n\n\n\n 2.<\/strong> Who is for Democrats and Republicans respectively the axis of cohesion of American society and what is its “backbone” respectively? How will this social class of citizens be strengthened to pull the economy forward and what policies must be implemented? <\/p>\n\n\n\n If there are no convincing answers and arguments in this type of important\nquestions, it is not possible for any political body to formulate solid\npolitical programs-social visions in all these areas to persuade citizens to\nparticipate with their vote in them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n It is all these detailed answers to this type of questions that shape the\npolitical identity of the parties and determine their perpetuation-existence in\nsociety.<\/p>\n\n\n\n However, in order to achieve these solid perceptions on the part of\npolitical parties, the political parties themselves, their representatives and\nnot only, will must have direct contact and are aware of the problems and\nanxieties of the citizens. Drawing in this way from their citizens the real\nimage which is existed every time in society. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Essentially, the answers to above mention questions should be able to\ninform them of the problems and the real situation that exists every time in\nsociety, information that should be given by all the citizens of a society. In\nthis context we will propose a package of measures that should be implemented\nby the state-country at community, City, Metropolis, state and national\nterritory equally. <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n The President of the French Republic Emmanuel Macron, in his attempt to\nsolve the demands of the yellow vests\u2019 movement, proposed to hold for two\nmonths the Great National Debate (GND) where the demands and anxieties of the\nFrench citizens will be recorded digitally and written-mainly in rural areas. <\/p>\n\n\n\n According to these documented requests for the problems will be decided on\nthe measures to be implemented to meet the demands of the yellow vests\u2019\nmovement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is a good basis for improving the model of liberal democracy as a\nmeans of governance. In my view, I believe that this process should be\nimplemented in all liberal societies and that it should be a continuous\nperpetual process that should never be stopped and not be lasting for only two\nmonths as proposed to be applied in France (Eurozone\/EU). <\/p>\n\n\n\n More specifically, with the continuous\nrecording of citizens’ requests for the problems they face and their anxieties\nfor the future there will always be a real, actual and continuous (and not\nstatic in time) picture of the problems of citizens at local, state, and\nnational level respectively. These requests as they will then be recorded can be prioritized according\nto the incidence of. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Since this type of organization and registration of requests will be archived\nelectronically and will have access to them, the representatives of the people\nat both local, state and national level (senators, MPs, mayors, regional\nleaders, local governors, party officials, election candidates, etc.) will be\nable to know directly and without the mediation of third parties (e.g. polling\nand research companies, media, local party executives, etc.) the real problems\nof citizens from the smallest community to the national level.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For example, the political leadership of a political party, without asking\nthe local MP or the mayor or the state senator, will be able to know the\nproblems of citizens from the smallest village to the largest city in a state. It will then be able to call on the local representatives\nof the citizens and jointly work out a program of proposals to be implemented\nto solve these problems. <\/p>\n\n\n\n At the same time the political leadership and the senior party bodies of a\npolitical party and having full knowledge of the problems of citizens at\nnational level can and will have shaped their beliefs and perceptions of how\nthe society must operate in order to achieve the common goal of achieving\nsocial well-being. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Based on these perceptions and beliefs they will then be able to accept\nsuggestions and always due to the answers they will get in various questions in\nkey areas of society (example of these questions we raised above) about which\nthe best way is to solve these problems from local to national level. <\/p>\n\n\n\n In this way, a workable and very detailed political program will be able to\ncover in solutions most citizens’ demands-problems, which should also be the\nvision of the political party that then should contact the citizens to persuade\nthem to participate with their vote on it. <\/p>\n\n\n\n In this way, substance programs are created, and political speeches are\ntransformed into speeches of substance, on which political parties can be\nconfronted in the political arena. <\/p>\n\n\n\n It is a crucial element, this process of registering citizens’ demands and\nproblems to be on a stable and permanent basis. Because in this way citizens\nfeel that they themselves are directly involved in the politics process and\nthat they are also involved in the social part of their local, state and\nnational society. <\/p>\n\n\n\n It is not possible for political rulers to appear before elections in their\nconstituencies to ask for the vote of the people and then disappear and appear\nafter four years to retake the vote of the citizens. These tactics create the\nremoval and alienation of citizens-especially young people-from politics. <\/p>\n\n\n\n The evaluation and resolution of these requests\/problems in solving them\nand at what stage is the resolution of these problems-and depending on their\nnature-should be done by completing a period of nine (9) months from the\ncitizens and their political representatives in order to taken, if required by\ncircumstances, structural movements to resolve them. <\/p>\n\n\n\n This process will work both ways in elections and in any party debates\nbefore national and generally any type of elections. <\/p>\n\n\n\n On the one hand, the mayoral candidates, congressmen, senators, etc. and\nthe leaderships of the political parties that will seek the vote of the\ncitizens will be bound to the voters with detailed proposals and concrete plans\nto solve these problems long before the national and any type of elections. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Then either win or lose the elections their relationship with the citizens\nwill continue with two-way interaction to resolve these hierarchical problems\nby promoting them through the position that political rulers will hold in\npolitical institutions of their country. <\/p>\n\n\n\n On the other hand, the ruling party that will emerge from the elections by\ncommitting to these plans it has proposed before the elections will then be\nable to demand that the citizens of the country not only be judged in any\nupcoming elections based on the degree solving these problems and implementing\nthe intended projects, but they will be able to demand as a majority during\ntheir governance the consensus and not to create disturbances in the economy\nand in society in order to achieve these objectives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The benefits that will have<\/strong> both the\ncitizens-voters and the political parties <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n The benefits of citizens and political parties from the process described above are:<\/p>\n\n\n\n 1.<\/strong> The parties that will ask for the vote of the citizens should draw up detailed plans that will include the jointly set of solutions to these problems at both national and local level.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2.<\/strong> The need to draw up detailed plans for their political programs will force political parties to place in their human resources qualified technocrats (for drawing up detailed technical plans at local, state and national level), but also people who know first-hand the problems of citizens (especially at local level).<\/p>\n\n\n\n 3.<\/strong> Full filtering of political parties is achieved by drastically reducing the existence of populist, opportunistic and liars in their ranks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 4.<\/strong> There is a direct, real and ongoing political link between political parties and citizens-voters.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 5.<\/strong> The citizens from their position because of the constant updating, recording and control of solving their problems in the course of the four years that mediate elections in elections are directly involved in the political process and in the social concerns of their places, setting together common objectives to be achieved. <\/p>\n\n\n\n This will apply to the younger generations of citizens who have so far been abstaining or are turning politics off. In fact, with this process, citizens are actively involved in a society that cares for them, and they care, strengthening relations between them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 6.<\/strong> Gradual restoration of the relationship of trust between citizens and the political world and political parties. A drastic reduction in the abstention of citizens in elections, with the result that there are increased and more representative percentages for the electorate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 7.<\/strong> Drastic improvement and strengthening of the democratic regime and especially of the liberal democracy model as a means of governance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This pioneering political process should be applied to any type of\nelection-national, state, local, etc.-and should be established by resolutions\nin the Constitution of each country, as an electoral process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Why the two major political parties in the US, Republican and Democratic\nrespectively, are largely alienating as are the respective political parties in\nthe EU by their citizens? <\/p>\n\n\n\n Why the current US President Donald John Trump\u2019s \u201cMake America Great Again\u201d\nelection slogan found preaching ears among US citizens and was voted the best\ncandidate to re-incorporate a large percentage of frustrated US citizens in the\nUS society? <\/p>\n\n\n\n The until today vaccinating policies in political and economic field will\nbear the anticipated results in economy of US? <\/p>\n\n\n\n These questions will be answered next week in the next and final part of\nour analysis “Decoding the policy to date of US President Donald John\nTrump-Part IV\u00bb. <\/p>\n\n\n\n