The \u201cexport of democracy\u201d through bombings and coups has only brought ruins and new enemies. As she put it: \u201cThe results have been trillions of dollars wasted, countless lives lost and, in many cases, the creation of greater security threats.\u201d Washington is beginning, albeit belatedly, to understand what Moscow has been pointing out since the early 21st century: the West\u2019s unipolar policy of domination is self-destructive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The US military over-presence \u2014 from Afghanistan to Syria \u2014 did not ensure stability, but it completely delegitimized American hegemony.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Dethronement of the \u201cWorld Savior\u201d – \u201cWorld Sheriff\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n When Trump spoke in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, he emphasized that the era of \u201cnation-building\u201d was over.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cThe so-called nation-builders have destroyed more nations than they have built,\u201d he said. \u201cPeace and progress come not from rejecting your identity, but from embracing your national traditions.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n This phrase summarizes the new Trump doctrine: each country has the right to determine its own destiny according to its own values \u200b\u200band culture. This position, although it sounds \u201canti-systemic\u201d by American standards, is completely in tune with the Russian view of international politics. Moscow has for decades supported the principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of states and the need to respect sovereignty \u2014 principles that the US, under previous administrations, systematically violated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Doctrine of American Messianism is Collapse<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n The wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya cost over $8 trillion and devastated entire regions. The result was the strengthening of the Islamic State, mass migration to Europe, and the dissolution of states that, although authoritarian, maintained internal order. Confessions like Gabbard\u2019s are a belated admission of defeat for Western interventionism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The United States has failed to impose pro-Western regimes not only in the Middle East, but also in Eastern Europe. Ukraine itself, which was the \u201clast experiment in regime change\u201d through the Maidan in 2014, is now collapsing militarily and economically.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The failure of the Ukrainian project has shown that exporting revolution and artificial democracy cannot take root in nations with different historical consciousness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Realism and regional balances<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Trump\u2019s Middle East policy is based on three principles:<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is a radical shift from the Bush-Obama-Biden doctrine. Washington now recognizes that the soft power of the market and regional alliances can achieve more than bombing and intervention.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The partial success of mediating a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, as well as the averting of a major conflict with Iran, show that the Trump White House prefers selective use of force over blind military operations, despite the serious obstacles it encounters from the all-powerful US military-industrial complex.<\/p>\n\n\n\n From Idealism to Pragmatism<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Gabbard spoke in Manama, Bahrain, of a \u201cfragile peace\u201d in Gaza and \u201cthe president\u2019s insistence on following this path.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n This admission marks the transition from idealistic messianism (the pseudo-moral discourse of \u201cfreedom\u201d) to realistic pragmatism, where national interests and regional balances prevail over abstract ideas. Washington, for the first time since 1945, is forced to see the world not as a field of domination, but as a complex mosaic of equal powers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This policy is more reminiscent of the era of balances of power of the 19th century than the imperialist rhetoric of the 20th.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The retreat of globalization and the new ethos of cooperation<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Gabbard\u2019s statements, and earlier Trump\u2019s, are linked to a broader global trend: the collapse of the neoliberal globalization model.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Wars, sanctions, and the imposition of \u201cdemocracy\u201d have worn out politically and economically. People, both in the West and in the South, are tired of paying the price of the arrogance of an elite that sees states as \u201cchessboards.\u201d Russia, China, and the rest of the global South are proposing cooperation based on mutual respect and sovereignty.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If Washington truly turns to this realistic model, the way may be opened for global deconfliction, a reduction in military conflicts, and a rebirth of international legitimacy.<\/p>\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n The End of the Era of the \u201cNew Crusades\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Tulsi Gabbard\u2019s speech was not just a statement. This new foreign policy framework\u2014based on national sovereignty, economic cooperation, and respect for cultural differences\u2014is a step in the right direction, if it is ultimately achieved.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If this trend takes hold, it could signal the end of an era of interventionism and the beginning of a truly multipolar world, where Russia, China, India, and the United States coexist as competing but indispensable partners in a new, more mature world.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The MAGA movement, which re-elected Trump as president of the United States, took up arms to wage the ultimate battle against the American Deep State for this purpose.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The statement by Tulsi Gabbard, the US Director of National Intelligence, on October 31st marks a historic turning point: the era of \u201cregime change\u201d…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":26690,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[390,819],"tags":[161,5602,7516,2358,655,1372,160,153,7044,4421,58,7154,70],"class_list":["post-26689","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politics","category-usa","tag-china","tag-deep-state","tag-dni","tag-doctrine","tag-donald-trump","tag-hamas","tag-iran","tag-israel","tag-maga","tag-multipolar-world","tag-russia","tag-tulsi-gabbard","tag-usa"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26689","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=26689"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26689\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":26692,"href":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26689\/revisions\/26692"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/26690"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=26689"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=26689"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=26689"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/image-8.png\")
<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n
It was the announcement of a new paradigm. Trump\u2019s America\u2014despite the military-industrial complex\u2019s hardline stance\u2014is trying to abandon the doctrine of \u201cglobal policeman\u201d and adopt a stance of regional prudence, recognizing that it cannot control the world.<\/p>\n\n\n\n