{"id":22028,"date":"2024-12-26T18:33:53","date_gmt":"2024-12-26T16:33:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/?p=22028"},"modified":"2024-12-26T18:33:53","modified_gmt":"2024-12-26T16:33:53","slug":"meta-politics-across-the-atlantic-in-north-america-part-xi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/?p=22028","title":{"rendered":"Meta politics: Across the Atlantic, in North America &#8211; Part XI"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>It is extremely useful to focus our attention on the ideological and political activity of the \u201cNew Right\u201d on the other side of the Atlantic, in North America. There, three basic principles of the secret war are adopted as canons:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>1.<\/strong> \u03a4he ideological foundations of the Nationalists are based on eternal and absolute values, because they believe that only foundations of this type can evoke the highest impersonal idealism as well as the greatest possible seriousness, but also preserve them for successive generations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>2.<\/strong> \u03a4he goals and foundations of the \u201cNew Right\u201d there (a white democracy or confederated white democracies in North America) are fixed, clearly defined and non-negotiable, in order to provide the firm and immovable Archimedean position where the fighters of North American Nationalism stand, rearranging the rest of the world to make it compatible with them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>3. <\/strong>\u03a4he indomitable pursuit of cultural and intellectual hegemony has been determined as the lever of movement of the world.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>From the stable and unshakable center of the complex morphofunctional network of doctrine and goals, white North American Nationalists weave lines of influence in all directions, systematically deconstructing all regime-hegemonic \u201canti-white\u201d ideas and building their own \u201ccounter-hegemony\u201d, in the form of feasible perspectives in favor of European-Americans, perspectives appropriately adapted to all existing white national and ethnic groups, as well as interest groups and perspectives disseminated through all accessible means of all kinds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The declared goal of the ideological-political European counterparts in North America is a truly pluralistic society, in which all shades of opinion that are constituent spheres of culture, as well as political choices, are compatible with the survival and flourishing of white people. That is, a society in which the degradation, removal and disappearance of the white man is obviously out of the question.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the USA, there are about 900 active Radical Right and Far Right groups of ideological texture and political form, with nativism at their core. Most of these groups are organizations of white Nationalists who believe in various ways in the historical superiority of the white race. For their members, the physical diversity of races is crucial, but the institutionally cultivated and selective \u201csocial diversity\u201d accepted and promoted in favor of vulnerable or wronged people of color is a disguised code name for the methodical \u201cpeaceful genocide of whites.\u201d Groups like the famous \u201cAlt Right\u201d where young Americans, the \u201cmillennial kids,\u201d participate do not wear military uniforms or the white robes of the Ku Klux Klan, but ordinary comfortable and carefree everyday clothes or suits. They are active on social media to convey their message and answer questions with irony and cheerfulness. However, they maintain as their unchanging objective a strong white nation, where &#8220;different&#8221; people of various types and origins will live restricted or repressed elsewhere.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>American Nationalists usually dislike immigrants working in the US, but they also detest the US political and economic elite, which they consider to be fully responsible for the transformation of America into a miserable melting pot of cultures. Also their opponents or enemies are the silver-plated academic community and the market media, which cultivate and promote the message against white natural and historical differentiation in every way. However, so far from this broad ideological-political space there is a complete major strategic vision missing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>An excellent example of a complete conception and description of a strategic vision are the notorious \u201cProtocols\u201d. These, regardless of whether they are not a single text per se written by some supreme leaders, regardless of whether they are formally not genuine as Julius Evola says, constitute a truly intelligently arranged literary presentation of the guiding intelligence of an ethno-racial group and its intertwined wishful futurological projections. A presentation fully confirmed to our days by historical events. They constitute a well-structured \u201cstrategic framework\u201d of a group that deeply believes that it is destined for world domination, which it has sought and continues to seek, in a different way, masterfully, through the covert war against Europeans, but also all the other peoples of the planet. They promised themselves the entire Cosmos and they fulfill their promise with admirable faith, devotion and perseverance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This attitude of theirs, if nothing else, constitutes a peculiar, pre-ordained \u201cdestiny\u201d, suitable for continuously mobilizing and empowering a people. In order to survive, one must primarily aim at something more than simple survival. In order to secure one\u2019s glorious future, one must clearly and intensely envision what that will be like! Obviously, if peoples possessed comparable abilities, means and goals, then peoples who do not have a sense of destiny would tend to become playthings of peoples who do have this sense. Moreover, this tendency multiplies exponentially as, from the outset, there is an inequality of advantages between peoples.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nationalists have a great need for a sense of a higher cosmic destiny to inspire and guide their people. They are the people who are interested in the well-being of the world, in the protection and preservation of the beautiful, the true, and the good.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Therefore, they must ensure the biological and cultural diversity of Europe while they must lay well-designed foundations for the upward development of the nations of our race. Moreover, from what we know so far, humanity is the only intelligent life form in the Universe, so our evolution can automatically be considered as the evolution of the universe as a whole.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It has been repeatedly emphasized in the recent past: As far as the Nationalists of Tomorrow are concerned more generally, they must act as the &#8220;fierce philhellenes&#8221; of philhellenes, identifying themselves as beings with the &#8220;Guardians of the Platonic Republic&#8221;. For this, they must develop the appropriate guiding intelligence, necessary for the fulfillment of the ancient Greek Platonic destiny.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Of course, from a political practice perspective, we must thoroughly investigate whether or not such a guiding intelligence needs to be integrated into a hierarchical occult order or whether it can exist in a coherent, decentralized, and resilient post-political network.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Therefore, in relation to the above, we definitely need a quiver full of practical ideas, capable of evolutionary and improving the nationalist policy of the cultivation type \/ &#8220;culture&#8221;. To influence the operation and the daily way of implementing nationalist policy in society, as well as to establish a reliable system of logistical care for the effective dissemination of these practical ideas, that is, we need a policy for nationalist policy, a compass for drawing nationalist policy. Otherwise, we are moving without an elementary concept of orientation and final goal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This compass for drawing policy is Metapolitics. Its practical purpose is to establish and consolidate a mechanism for incorporating sound principles, principles relevant to a policy process, that is, a mechanism suitable for producing improved policy outcomes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>From a post-political perspective, a model of policy analysis, as it emerged from the examination of what has happened on both sides of the Atlantic, is based on the following criteria for evaluating <em>every policy<\/em>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Suitability:<\/strong> is this policy suitable to be chosen and to serve the purpose for which it was designed?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Effectiveness: <\/strong>How well does it work? (or how well is it predicted to work?)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Efficiency:<\/strong> How much work does it require? Or what support does its implementation entail? Are there significant costs associated with it? Is it worth taking on?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Reliability:<\/strong> Does the citizen &#8211; recipient of the certainty feel that the evaluated policy was designed for the purpose it declared and that it will be implemented faithfully, without alterations and selective &#8220;discounts&#8221;?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Integrity:<\/strong> Does the citizen trust nationalistic political representatives for their integrity in the formulation and implementation of nationalist policy? That is, does he trust that they will not serve their personal or &#8220;client&#8221; interests?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Ethical issues:<\/strong> Is it morally and ethically sound? Are there unintended side effects and consequences in its manifestation and implementation?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Evaluations of alternative solutions:<\/strong> Compared with different approaches, how appropriate is the proposed policy solution? Have all relevant other approaches been tested?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Consultative process in policy formulation and in the implementation of improvements and positive changes:<\/strong> What is best to implement? Does the policy under consideration need to be modified, replaced, abolished or added?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>We have mentioned many times that the term Metapolitics has been used in various ways for about two centuries. The prefix \u201cmeta\u201d often refers to the possibility of re-examination, review and reflection of the following second component: metacognition, metalanguage\u2026 (in fact, it is in this sense that the social democrat professional politician Evangelos Venizelos, the creator of the term \u201cconstitutional arc\u201d, used the term metapolitics: As a transcendence of politics and as a reflective intervention \u201cfor the common good\u201d).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the space of ideas of the active North American New Right and the New European Right, the use of the term Metapolitics refers to intervention not at the level of politics in the narrow sense (i.e. of ideas in the political field) but at the level of the cultural values \u200b\u200band ideas of a society. Indeed, this usage touches, in part, on the Gramscian view of Hegemony. In France, many conservative and Nationalist academics have adopted this view of post-politics with the aim of \u201cshaking off the legacy of May 1968\u201d as Jean-Marie Le Pen\u2019s granddaughter, Marion Marechal, put it bluntly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Related to and expanding on the aforementioned second version of Post-Politics, an expansion to a higher and more complex level (without being incompatible with its previous version) is the aim of exercising politics beyond the ideological limits inherited from the French Revolution, Marxism and the ideological currents of the 19th and 20th centuries. In this third version of Metapolitics, which we are still composing and structuring, the interactive homogenization of selected ideas from the aforementioned previous policies operates and their newly formed active alloy is formed: The defense of Tradition is chosen, social inequalities are strongly denounced with groundbreaking radical assumptions and the appropriate evolutionary institutional counterweights are sought to balance potential state excesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This last version of Metapolitics dynamically transcends older ideological ankylosis, coexists with pragmatism and pierces regimes ideological borders. It concerns a deliberate transcendence and dismemberment of past ideological textures, in order to achieve the selective combination of their functional components. A typical example of the successful use of this differentiated Metapolitics on the European continent in our days concerns the targeted activity, especially on the immigration issue, of the moderate and bourgeois democracy-compromised Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Survival integration into the Regime? Retreat (from what?) and betrayal of ideas? Cowardice and fraud under the guise of major strategic maneuvers? Repair of the shameful apostasy of Fini? Its embellished repetition? \u2026\u2026. History will show in the future. But this will not come by itself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The decision and position of the nationalists, either as active participation or as active absence, is of crucial importance. It is enough only for them to honestly decide which of the two is better for the survival and rebirth of Nationalism.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It is extremely useful to focus our attention on the ideological and political activity of the \u201cNew Right\u201d on the other side of the&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":21041,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[988,7],"tags":[6371,3345,6096,6370,6368,6094,6369,70,6372],"class_list":["post-22028","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-political-science","category-research","tag-alt-right","tag-far-right-2","tag-meta-politics","tag-nativism","tag-north-america","tag-post-politics-2","tag-radical-right","tag-usa","tag-6372"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22028","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=22028"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22028\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22029,"href":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22028\/revisions\/22029"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/21041"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=22028"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=22028"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=22028"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}