Another term for the aforementioned meta-political power is the term “Hegemony”. Our ancestral word means leadership, omnipotence, dominion or rule exercised from a distance. Hegemony in practice is remote control.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Specifically, for the ancient Greeks, the term hegemony refers to imperial (or federal) leadership, in which the ruler rules the other states in foreign and military affairs, but leaves domestic matters in their own hands. Therefore, to the everyday person, the skilled in the field of the “man on the sidewalk,” Hegemony appears as a distant, indirect, mediated, “soft” form of power and authority.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Also, hegemony can take an intellectual and cultural form, governing the political sector, shaping the values \u200b\u200band ideas that set the parameters and goals of political confrontation and activity. For example, today, the hegemony of anti-national, multicultural ideas in politics means that it really does not matter which party holds the power, as in the end the power of all of them will be used against the national interests. But the reverse is also possible: If nationalist ideas achieve cultural hegemony, it will no longer matter which party holds political power and influence, since all these parties will treat the interests of the Genus as sacred and inviolable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The concepts of metapolitics and hegemony are the keys to understanding the differences between the old left and the new left, as well as between the old right and the new right.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Old Right emerged as a historical reaction to the Old Left. The Old Left tried to impose communism through the politics of one-partyism and the totalitarian state, using “red terror” and sometimes genocide as political tools. Just as one takes a dagger in a sword fight or a gun in a gun fight, the Old Right used the chosen weapons of the Old Left to resist and prevail. The Old Right fought violence with violence, hard political power with hard political power.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The “New Left”, the most accurate example of which is the “Frankfurt School”, replaced politics with post-politics, the hard totalitarianism of the “Old Left” with the “smoothed” soft totalitarianism of the left’s cultural hegemony and the dictatorship of opinion and policy correctness. The “New Left” realized that “leftist values” could be imposed without violent revolution and without a totalitarian, one-sided state, simply by controlling education and culture.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Is it possible for one to have complete social hegemony while at the same time maintaining the illusion of freedom and free pluralism, ensuring that all competing cultural currents and political parties, forming .. compacts calling themselves “democratic arches” and “democratic factions”, adopt the same leftist values, differing only in non-essential matters. (They could call themselves “rainbows” or “humanitarian factions” or even \u2026 “fortress of the pious”. The title has only a propaganda – seductive meaning for the popular mass and no real dimension). The post-political trajectory of our country is a masterful application of the above tactics, techniques and procedures of neo-left political and social management.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The New Left has been highly successful. Today we live in a left-wing, “softly totalitarian” society, which the multi-talented and versatile British Nationalist Jonathan David Anthony Bowden has aptly described as a “left-wing oligarchy” and represents a system of vast economic and political inequalities in which everyone participates “softly” and without ” extreme” manifestations the left slogans.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
[Bowden (1962 \u2013 2012) was an English painter, novelist, essayist, playwright, actor, orator and political activist. Initially he was a conservative, while later he participated in nationalist political organizations such as the “British National Party”. Bowden was even posthumously described as an “adorable online figure” of the “alt-right”].<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Just as the Old Right took up arms during armed civil strife, not surrendering to the adversary, the nationalist and patriotic New Right must use ideas in an evolving battle of ideas. We must deconstruct the hegemony of anti-national \u2013 ethno-deconstructive ideas and replace them with a rival Roman hegemony of national \u2013 ethnocentric ideas. We must create our own post-political organizations (new media, new educational institutions, new forms of community and collectives) which can fight and replace their counterparts in the hands of the ethnic destroyers. We must fight any wicked-anti-national ideas with better-more compact and clearer national ideas. We must fight the undermining and subversion of national institutions and foundations in our country with their drastic, rude and widespread nationalist institutional renewal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A post-political approach continues to be within our means. The global, European, regional and national political situation has never been more suitable for the recovery of Nationalism. Despite the fact that they lack financial resources, organization and political power, despite the fact that the nationalist movement was fragmented into many conflicting fragments, Nationalism as a fully formed ideology, but mainly as an alternative political practice, has never been stronger. On the contrary, the enemy, in all its manifestations, has never been richer, better organized, more powerful politically. But from a moral, scientific and historical point of view, these manifestations have never been weaker than they are now. As human beings its representatives were never more corrupt, decadent and ridiculous. Their attitudes are made up of lies, monstrosities, unsupported bigots and unfulfilled promises, while their bulimic and devoid of any form of empathy, predatory social analgesia, gallops in all fields of public life.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It should be pointed out here that two political paradigms that were once violent and radical expressions of the wider patriotic and nationalist community are completely useless in the intended post-political struggle: Every kind of liberalism [especially Libertarianism or Libertarianism (or Libertarian Nationalism, or Anarcho-Capitalism)], as well as the nationalist organizations of the Old Right type (as defined above), which for more than a decade referred to themselves as the seductive “Popular Nationalism”, are now an unfortunate and failed thing of the past. The approaches of both conceive of politics exclusively as a kind of hard power while overlooking, underestimating or downright scorning the role of soft power.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Obsessive liberals oppose the exercise of hard power by the state, which is in principle accountable for the public good, but they have no problem with the application of unlimited soft power as long as it is exercised by private actors. Liberals are opposed to any form of government censorship but have no problem with censorship by private so-called grassroots organizations, organizations that urge, control and enforce conditions of contemporary political correctness. These organizations seek the adoption and implementation of political correctness by every public and government body, while compiling detailed lists of dissenters to be silenced using social media, fundraising initiatives, social networking providers and financial services companies. These demonized dissidents are labeled “fascists”, “philo-fascists” or “crypto-fascists”, relegated to the social “outer fire” and annihilated in every way.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The only objection a Libertarian could have against the complete plutocratic globalist domination of the media is if \u2026 the media’s checks for services rendered were returned as blanks. Otherwise, everything is acceptable, “voluntary” and \u2026 well dressed!<\/p>\n\n\n\n
All the aforementioned formations that work for the dictatorship of political correctness are considered and projected as “voluntary”. However, liberals of various typologies are mobilizing to resist any kind of state intervention that would end their censorship or deprive it of a platform. Thus, liberalism not only blinds the popular masses to the activities of soft power exercised, but in principle passionately opposes any use of state power that can limit and curtail the application of this soft power.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
As for the contemporary imitators of the Old Right ways, they spend their time imagining scenarios of race wars, mass Third World invasions, scenarios in which non-existent and imaginary armed national revolutionary parties defeat the aforementioned opponents, together with accomplices the “national traitors” of the establishment. “national” government. Samples of such an apprehension are to be found in the captivating novels of writers such as transatlanticists William Peirce and Harold Armstead Covington. This particular parapolitical scenario is often able to drive the most impatient and antisocial human types (who are of course also in the national-patriotic space) to unnecessary and pointless acts of violence to the point of irrational rage. While communists and anarchists freely represent the historical Bolsheviks in modern role-playing games, the traditional Old Right at the height of its opposition to them appeared in helmets and shields as a modern representation of the German National Socialist-Nazis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Although intellectually and morally the cause of Nationalism has never been more viable than today, while the cause of multiculturalism has never appeared to be weaker than it is today, it must finally be fully and deeply realized that the struggling Nationalists are unable to suppress with any form of armed struggle \u2026. the police (as imagined by various mentally ill people) or even the private security guards of shopping mall protection teams. This kind of political struggle is useless, harmful, wrong in conception and pernicious in action. Its apologists of any origin (deceitful expediency or morbid stupidity) must therefore be rejected.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It is the height of strategic insanity and idiocy to disengage and abandon the major forces of Nationalism and to refuse to attack the enemy where he is completely weak, while on the contrary it is sought to attack the enemy in the field of “hard power” where he is powerful and we sick. This certainly does not mean that today there is no place for street activism, but that this activism should be perceived only as a post-political activity, as a form of propaganda, wherever and whenever it is accessible and not as a battle for “control of the streets”, the which, apart from rare fleeting successes, was fruitless and groundless. Active politics follows in time the critical preparatory level, during which a solid preliminary background of fully developed metapolitical bases is fully developed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
To conceive of Nationalism as politics without metapolitics (simply as a struggle for political power, regardless of whether our people like it or not) is basically to put ourselves in the position of an invading army or an unpopular and unpopular revolutionary party, the which he seeks to conquer power and impose his will on the people. This is the bedrock of the political template, the “model”, of the Old Right.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Obviously the exact opposite extreme is “metapolitics without politics”, but this approach actually has a finite chance of working. If the Nationalists achieve complete hegemony in the post-political field, this means that national interests will be sacred and non-national ideas will be truly anathema. In such a situation, the Nationalists should not organize themselves as a political party to seize power, because they will have captured the will of the public, and all existing political parties will be de facto, voluntarily or involuntarily, patriotic national parties, because they will actually serve national interests.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In such a society, we would still argue about abortion and taxes, but the positions of all sides would be arguments between same-sex – same-sex people only. There would be no possibility of alliance with allo-aliens to gain short-term political advantages in exchange for our own flesh and blood, and the degradation and destruction of our race would simply be outside the realm of political possibility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Frankly, this society would be a nationalist “utopia” satisfying enough.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Another term for the aforementioned meta-political power is the term “Hegemony”. Our ancestral word means leadership, omnipotence, dominion or rule exercised from a distance….<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":21041,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[988,7],"tags":[6159,4404,4405,6158,6160,6092,2646],"class_list":["post-21243","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-political-science","category-research","tag-dictatorship-of-opinion","tag-global-hegemony","tag-hegemony","tag-metapolitics","tag-policy-correctness","tag-postpolitics","tag-right"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21243","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=21243"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21243\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21244,"href":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21243\/revisions\/21244"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/21041"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=21243"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=21243"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.liberalglobe.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=21243"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}